Posting weed to UK from 'Dam

Pauli Wallnuts · Post by **Pauli Wallnuts** » Sun 21st Feb 2010 12:26 am

Twichaldinho wrote: You looked like the Kinda guy who would have a tommy gun when we met in January Pauli, long black jacket and what not, defo an air of Gangster about ya.

Cisco · Post by **Cisco** » Sun 21st Feb 2010 10:37 pm

Nice PW

Yeah your aloud to send any gun through the post as long as you dont send the ammo with it !!!!???? mental

ReeferBen · Post by **ReeferBen** » Mon 22nd Feb 2010 02:26 am

Given the sheer number of parcels that are processed on a daily basis (thousands), the resources required would in all likely hood bankrupt any postal system. The same could be argued for transporting gear in a body cavity. I have read where women have inserted packaged gear in their vagina. A similar response to yours was posted, and similar responses to mine were given - how can this be realistically enforced? Body cavity search for all females that depart The Netherlands? Assign a drug dog to every post office? See how this is spiraling to the absurd? Careful planing and most importantly, proper packaging techniques should provide a good chance for success.

I thought Schiphol was using full body scans on every passenger leaving now. The kind that showed what you might have swallowed of stuffed inside you.

Maybe its just for US bound passengers after all

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5071858,00.html

What are the UK laws like about marijuana?

moby69 · Post by **moby69** » Mon 22nd Feb 2010 12:10 pm

The scanners CANNOT see inside you.

Boner · Post by **Boner** » Mon 22nd Feb 2010 12:32 pm

Valo · Post by **Valo** » Mon 22nd Feb 2010 12:41 pm

moby69 wrote:The scanners CANNOT see inside you.

Only one place to put it then!

ReeferBen · Post by **ReeferBen** » Mon 22nd Feb 2010 10:39 pm

http://www.schiphol.nl/Travellers/AtSch ... tyScan.htm

Thats what I was talking about.

"Security Scan different from Body Scan
The Security Scan should not be confused with the Body Scan used by Customs for so-called 100% security screening at the airport. Unlike the Security Scan, the Body Scan uses X-rays that pass through the body to trace swallowed items."

Maybe I am confused.

moby69 · Post by **moby69** » Tue 23rd Feb 2010 10:38 am

Just as well ''for now, the use of the Security Scan is not obligatory ''
This seems to be the widely used one .
The other is just used for suspected villians I would imagine and not widely used at all .
In fact It is probably in a hospital cos they aren't even mentioned .

''All security scans at the airport are
provided with the new software
enabling the automated detection
of objects on people’s bodies.''

''The Security Scan works on the basis of
harmless millimetre wave technology.
This is entirely different from X-rays (as used
in hospitals), which go straight through your
body. When the scan is made the waves are
reflected on the body, thus revealing
any objects the person is carrying.''

''The Security Scan uses
harmless millimetre waves that bounce
off the skin and do not enter the body''

moby69 · Post by **moby69** » Tue 23rd Feb 2010 10:55 am

Boner wrote:

Like I said , The scanners CANNOT see inside you.

DeathRowRecords · Post by **DeathRowRecords** » Tue 2nd Mar 2010 04:12 pm

Edited.

sam508 · Post by **sam508** » Tue 2nd Mar 2010 05:30 pm

[/quote]I thought Schiphol was using full body scans on every passenger leaving now. The kind that showed what you might have swallowed of stuffed inside you.

Maybe its just for US bound passengers after all

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5071858,00.html

What are the UK laws like about marijuana?[/quote]

I saw no scanners for uk flights when i was out there at the end of jan. Im pretty sure its just for USA flights!
I Filled my space case grinder up in the kif chamber with a couple of grams of grey cristal, with the thought pattern that i have never had any problems with the grinder in hand luggage before. So even if a dog sniffs it it just skinks cos its been recently used! and if they bother to figure out there is a bottom compartment then i say i forgot to empty it. I know its not full proof but its a method none the less.lol.

HerrÃ–veri · Post by **HerrÃ–veri** » Fri 5th Mar 2010 04:25 am

So is it still safe to wrap hash into condoms and swallowing them?

I heard about this guy on papers who had over 2 meters of condoms in his guts filled with coke, must have been pretty unpleasant. Boarder customs somehow managed to get him and he confessed. There was nothing else to do, but to wait..

Would be so cool to get some smokable souveniers back home, but my butthole sadly has only the exit option, booger.

templeball · Post by **templeball** » Fri 5th Mar 2010 06:13 pm

HerrÖveri wrote:So is it still safe to wrap hash into condoms and swallowing them?

I heard about this guy on papers who had over 2 meters of condoms in his guts filled with coke, must have been pretty unpleasant. Boarder customs somehow managed to get him and he confessed. There was nothing else to do, but to wait..

Would be so cool to get some smokable souveniers back home, but my butthole sadly has only the exit option, booger.

...try a shoe horn

Carlos · Post by **Carlos** » Fri 5th Mar 2010 11:31 pm

if you swallow it then it will be exit only

treetop · Post by **treetop** » Sat 20th Mar 2010 08:07 pm

They used a scanner on me on the way home to UK from the Dam in March. It was kinda fun. You could tell they were new. You had to hold your hands up like you would if PW had his Tommy Gun trained on you.

I put my hands down too fast and they got all in a tizz and we had to start over which meant 2x as much fun for my stoned arse