Page 5 of 18

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 05:37 pm
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
Im not American

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 05:37 pm
by DazedandConfusedinOR
HENRY VIII wrote:
DazedandConfusedinOR wrote:The only thing I want to see Palin in is Playboy. She epitomizes what a MILF should be. Dumb as nails but a total fox.

As far as politics are concerned, Palin isn't the answer. She's a terrible public speaker and knows squat about foreign policy. Look out for Bobby Jindal in 2012 - current Governor of Louisiana.

All the naive young people over here believed Obama's campaign promises (aka lies). Look who's laughing now. Assholes can be found in any country and any political party, but that is what makes the world go round.

Adamster is just another young, clueless, naive twit. I actually feel bad for him in a way. He knows nothing about history except for what he reads on Wikipedia apparently, whereas I actually have a degree in history from Binghamton University. That's why it's so fucking funny reading his rants. He just digs himself into a hole with every ill-informed word he writes.

I really don't see the logic behind putting people down because of what country they're from or what race or nationality they are. These are archaic concepts that some people continue to hold on to, but of are no use as we move forward.



"...whereas I actually have a degree in history from Binghamton University..."




"Adamster is just another young, clueless, naive twit"


Get over yourself we are all entitled to an opinion!
Where did I say the little twit wasn't entitled to his opinion? It's just that he's so damned stupid, it's funny!

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 06:12 pm
by Adamster
Pff! history degree MY ASS your the shit coming out of it!

if you know your history tell me whom told canada the american was coming to invated canada in 1812 and where did the canadian soldier came from to get to invasion and were was the first invasion? and tell me more if you can awnser (ill know if your WIKI-ed it ) « why? cause my History teach put that page up to see if WE would try and CHEAT so he changed names around so..Take out your school book little child! :twisted:

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 06:23 pm
by DazedandConfusedinOR
Adamster wrote:Pff! history degree MY ASS your the shit coming out of it!

if you know your history tell me whom told canada the american was coming to invated canada in 1812 and where did the canadian soldier came from to get to invasion and were was the first invasion? and tell me more if you can awnser (ill know if your WIKI-ed it ) « why? cause my History teach put that page up to see if WE would try and CHEAT so he changed names around so..Take out your school book little child! :twisted:
Easy there kemosabe or back to the reservation with you!

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 06:39 pm
by Adamster
éy tonto i aint an idiot ;)

Posted: Fri 15th Jan 2010 11:43 pm
by Stanky Danky
Adamster wrote:éy tonto i aint an idiot ;)
Don't flatter yourself, your an incredible idiot.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 12:52 am
by intricatethakid
Adamster, I think you're missing the point.

It appears your biases towards America really defeats any possibility of objectivity.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 01:15 am
by FenixNYC
DazedandConfusedinOR wrote:The only thing I want to see Palin in is Playboy. She epitomizes what a MILF should be. Dumb as nails but a total fox.
*nods & throws a thumb up*

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 02:54 am
by cantona7
a little off topic i know but had a question. although i consider myself a history nut i have done very little research on the war of 1812 an saw it brought up here. didn't the canadians along with the british at some point during the conflict march into washington dc and try to pull a stund similiar to what sherman did to atlanta 50 years later and burn it down? i know the white house was burned down at the least. once again sorry to go off topic.

as far as adamster im sure hes a cool guy but he seems to be the type that no matter how much you try to debate him hes not going to change his mind as hes to biased maybe? just kind of an observation.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 10:05 am
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
intricatethakid wrote:Adamster, I think you're missing the point.

It appears your biases towards America really defeats any possibility of objectivity.

Most of the people here AGREE with you that invading Iraq was wrong. Most of the people here AGREE with you that bombing Hiroshima was an awful thing.

You're just not getting it. AGAIN, the decisions of American politicians are NOT always reflective of the American people.

You're absolutely right that when a country such as America goes meddling in places such as the Middle East, responses such as 9/11 will happen. But that does not JUSTIFY the slaughtering of thousands of innocent civilains. Just like the Japanese bombing Pearl Harbor while pretending to be in the middle of peace deals does not make nuking Hiroshima okay. This is not a competition. 1 million dead people in America are the same as 1 million dead people in Canada which is the sam as 1 million dead people in Egypt or where the fuck ever else. The end result? A FUCKING TRAGEDY! PEOPLE have died, not Americans, or Canadians, or Egyptians. PEOPLE.

Its just weird. You seem to hate and despise America so much, and yet you sound so much like the bigots and idiots who say that we should be in Iraq to kill muslims cause they're all terrorists. Doesn't matter what country your from. Hate is hate no matter what. If I were you I'd smoke a bowl and really reconsider your whole thought process.
*nod*

Just to be devils advocate, as much as Adamster is biased surely Stanky Danky is as well?

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 10:15 am
by Stanky Danky
What am I biased about?

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 10:24 am
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
Stanky Danky wrote:What am I biased about?
Everyone throws the word biased around, but your just as biased, as i Adamster, as is the Queen of England. Your biased towards jumping to Americas defense, Adamster is biased towards hating the place. Everyone has a bias, the objective world is filtered by vision, cognitive functions, social norms and finally human naivety.

I just dont think its right to calling Adamster an idoit is right, English is his second language, he does alright. He's not an idiot, he has a different opinion than you, you dont have the right to call anyone an idiot he has just as much freedom to expression than anyone.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 10:46 am
by Stanky Danky
It is easy to call anyone who has an opinion biased. I didn't call Adamster an idiot for his poor english. I called him an idiot for saying things that made absolutely no sense. I don't think I jumped to defend America either. I simply told Adamster he was having sympathy for a mass murderer, and that America was fighting the taliban not the country of Afghanistan. I don't really think either of those are defending America, just giving Adamster the facts.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 10:56 am
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
Stanky Danky wrote:It is easy to call anyone who has an opinion biased. I didn't call Adamster an idiot for his poor english. I called him an idiot for saying things that made absolutely no sense. I don't think I jumped to defend America either. I simply told Adamster he was having sympathy for a mass murderer, and that America was fighting the taliban not the country of Afghanistan. I don't really think either of those are defending America, just giving Adamster the facts.
They are your facts. Was you in the war room making the decision, do you know the motives behind the people who decided to go to war, were you in their brains? If not, then its your interpretation of the situation, your interpretation is biased as it was made by you. Therefore your biased interpretation holds just as much validity as Adamsters.

Anyone that has an opinion is biased, any thought on any subject said by anyone is biased. Because for that opinion to exist, there is a degree of cognitive actions behind it. It's easy to call someone with an opinion biased because its true.

I think you were defending America, theres nothing wrong with that, Adamster gave anti-America sentiments, you gave pro-America sentiments. Both are equally biased.

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 11:06 am
by Stanky Danky
There is no pro-American sentiment in telling him America is fighting the taliban, not the country of Afghanistan. I was simply correcting him where he was factually incorrect. America has already instated a new leader in Afghanistan, they have no need to defeat the country.