Course not, theres no obviously pro-American sentiment in that as apposed to what Adamster and others think that America only used Afghanistan as a jump to Iraq and the war is based as much on religious differences between the old guard of Evangelical Christians and Islam?Stanky Danky wrote:There is no pro-American sentiment in telling him America is fighting the taliban, not the country of Afghanistan. I was simply correcting him where he was factually incorrect. America has already instated a new leader in Afghanistan, they have no need to defeat the country.
Your a history major right, you must of the statement that ' History is written by the victors?" This is my point you keep saying facts facts facts. But you have no idea if they are facts, its your interpretation that they are facts. You was not there when the decisions where made, you do not know anymore than the rest of us. But you attribute factual statements towards yours, but anyone other is wrong. My point, which your ignoring, is your facts are no more factual than Adamsters, you call bias on his, theres bias on yours EVERYTHING HAS BIAS.
Im not here to discuss the pros and cons of Afghanistan reform, but, i wouldnt shout so loudly about instilling a new leader when he only got his place because of stuffed ballots and corruption, thereby making this Government corrupt. Lets not forget who funded and armed the Taliban in the first place?
But as i said, im not here to discuss that, you can change the subject and dodge the point all you want, but my views are biased, as are yours, as are Adamsters and everyone elses.
