Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon 17th May 2010 05:26 pm
by Twichaldinho
I know you should be in Amsterdam, which sucks, but hey, this piece of work is very special indeed ( parts 1&2 ).
You have made a lowly stoners monday much brighter. Be proud.

Posted: Fri 21st May 2010 12:56 am
by cattales1960
I just got back into town yesterday and IM trying to catch up. I just wanted you to know I am looking forward to reading part2.
Posted: Sun 23rd May 2010 03:10 pm
by cattales1960
what a wonderful story dave and I do know alot of people just like you and love to hear their stories.
Posted: Sun 23rd May 2010 04:05 pm
by ftcarer
Posted: Thu 27th May 2010 04:05 pm
by Nice Dreams
What a great read mate, sounds like you really had a blast. Have you ever been back to india since the 60's?
Posted: Sat 19th Jun 2010 04:20 am
by davex4
A late reply I know, but for us ageing hippies time sometimes stands still. Thanks for that stoned since 67, no, haven't read that novel , but just looked it up on the net - sounds great, and have just ordered a copy.
And nice dreams, yeah went back to Goa in 1999 as I had always promised myself to go back there, but to do it style now I have a few bob behind me. Stayed in a luxury hotel near Panjim on and all inclusive deal. The atmosphere of the place was the same, but found it a bit of a tourist trap and the beach I sang Ruby Tuesday on was full of hotels and stuff and those cute beach lodges we stayed in were all gone. Its always hard to go back, but the charas was plentiful ! - and whilst there I met a young engaged couple from Bracknell. We became good friends and the following year I was their best man at their wedding . On the grooms stag night back in the U.K. we got so stoned and laughed so much that I split a rib and ended up in casualty! Was all I could do the following weekend to get my caks on, let alone give a speech, but I seem to recall I managed it OK.
Peace, love and happiness to you all and may the Daily Mail readers finally find out that a fat one beats alcohol hands down and even makes the M25 tolerable. In my life time? - maybe, but I think not (therefore I am)
---------------------
smoke on peeps
Posted: Sat 19th Jun 2010 10:21 am
by spidergawd
Nice one Dave
Peace, love and happiness to you all and may the Daily Mail readers finally find out that a fat one beats alcohol hands down and even makes the M25 tolerable. In my life time? - maybe, but I think not (therefore I am)
For Mail readers we will wait a while, but I know a bunch of telegiraph readers that do the cryptic crossy daily with a fat one. With unpredictable and sometimes hilarious results it has to be said though.

But it keeps our few grey cells sparking, just.

Posted: Sat 19th Jun 2010 03:29 pm
by davex4
Can never get my head around those cryptic puzzles Sidergawd. Will now give it a bash the next time I am stoned. I should add that a few years ago I met the man who invented crosswords. Can't quite remember his name though, but I think it was P something T something R.
Make sure you book up for 420 in 2011 - we can show the youngsters how a fat one should be made 60's style!
__________________
Don't wear sandals, you cant afford the scandal
Posted: Wed 23rd Jun 2010 10:13 am
by spidergawd
Well mate I did 420 this year and I have to admit it was probably more than I should have attempted at my age (63)

. So I shall stick to my bike rides with my pal and gentle summer trips with my Lady. But I do hope our paths cross at some time in the 'Dam and I will enjoy attempting to explain the mysteries of the Telegraph cryptic, and swapping a few yarns with ya
A linky to a bike trip.
https://www.coffeeshopdirect.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9475
Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Tue 15th Feb 2011 12:51 am
by recrec
Thanks for the great story share! Life was much freeier back then compared with today and all its regulations! Amsterdam and the Net are probably one of the few exceptions...
Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Mon 31st Oct 2011 11:57 am
by verticalSquare
Really enjoyed this, thanks for posting

Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Mon 31st Oct 2011 03:13 pm
by cattales1960
wonder what happened to dave4x.
Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Fri 4th Nov 2011 03:55 pm
by davex4
cattales1960 wrote:wonder what happened to dave4x.
Rumour has it Cat that he was last seen hitching across the USA looking for Woodstock. He was wearing a flower in his hair and singing Beatles songs.

Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Fri 4th Nov 2011 04:49 pm
by cattales1960
davex4 wrote:cattales1960 wrote:wonder what happened to dave4x.
Rumour has it Cat that he was last seen hitching across the USA looking for Woodstock. He was wearing a flower in his hair and singing Beatles songs.

LOL there you are. Was sort of missing your crazy antics. lol.
Re: NOT Amsterdam, but India 1968. Part 2, say high to 1969
Posted: Fri 4th Nov 2011 10:09 pm
by spidergawd
cattales1960 wrote:davex4 wrote:cattales1960 wrote:wonder what happened to dave4x.
Rumour has it Cat that he was last seen hitching across the USA looking for Woodstock. He was wearing a flower in his hair and singing Beatles songs.

LOL there you are. Was sort of missing your crazy antics. lol.
Me too
