Conspiracies!
Moderator: Balou
It was a question...06, thought it was 07, what's up luv...the oul memory not what it used to be?. Don't worry, no matter what anybody says about ya, I'm sure the knicker elastic producers of America are glad yer very round, I mean ...around. Keep on talkin, the only thing it does is prove a point and increase the street value of a current pic of yerself, again though, I've just thrown up a little in my mouth. Maybe that's just at the thoughts of you telling us you go commando!.

lol I don't think I've even said the word 'conspiracy' yet.
lol I don't think I've even said the word 'conspiracy' yet.
- USbongLord
- Posts: 6704
- Joined: Tue 19th Sep 2006 07:47 pm
- Location: Baltimore,Amsterdam
- USbongLord
- Posts: 6704
- Joined: Tue 19th Sep 2006 07:47 pm
- Location: Baltimore,Amsterdam
- USbongLord
- Posts: 6704
- Joined: Tue 19th Sep 2006 07:47 pm
- Location: Baltimore,Amsterdam
- Sir Niall of Essex-sire
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Thu 20th Mar 2008 04:38 pm
So eye witness testimony is rock solid? Fuck me, i thought accepted standards of evidence couldn't get any lower.
I know you can give some people a mountain of evidence and they still won't believe a conspiracy is possible, but here's more rock solid evidence anyway. Eyewitness report after eyewitness report of secondary explosions, and somehow this evidence doesn't make it into the government investigation.
Research Eyewitness testimony and the HUGE problems with accepting it as an acceptable form of evidence before claiming it as solid proof. In fact, there's huge amounts of people calling for eye witness testimony to be removed from legal precedings as an acceptable form of evidence.
Defeating evil with a thing called love
-
the happy hacker
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Wed 17th Sep 2008 11:08 pm
- Location: On the Outside Looking in-------- Trips to Dam 20+
- Stanky Danky
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Fri 27th Nov 2009 08:59 am
- Location: YOUR MOTHERS PANTIES
Yes one eyewitness is not solid evidence, but hundreds of people saying the same thing is rock solid in my opinion. If you watch the video I posted there's also clear evidence of an explosion when the firefighters are at the base of the building.Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:So eye witness testimony is rock solid? Fuck me, i thought accepted standards of evidence couldn't get any lower.
I know you can give some people a mountain of evidence and they still won't believe a conspiracy is possible, but here's more rock solid evidence anyway. Eyewitness report after eyewitness report of secondary explosions, and somehow this evidence doesn't make it into the government investigation.
Research Eyewitness testimony and the HUGE problems with accepting it as an acceptable form of evidence before claiming it as solid proof. In fact, there's huge amounts of people calling for eye witness testimony to be removed from legal precedings as an acceptable form of evidence.


