Conspiracies!

the happy hacker · Post by **the happy hacker** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:06 pm

Dava wrote:
the happy hacker wrote:
bluelaru wrote:OMFG ...

The whole building WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE WIRED
just a little here and there..... why not just stick a nuke in there... that's it thats how they did it ,i must call dylan avery right now Loose Change 4.1

seems like they had a whole floor full of 'batteries' *cough*thermite*couch*

Yeah what floor was that ?

Dava · Post by **Dava** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:07 pm

my bad, i referred 'he'

i havent been around here long bluelaru, my apologies

Dava · Post by **Dava** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:09 pm

the happy hacker wrote:
Dava wrote:
the happy hacker wrote: just a little here and there..... why not just stick a nuke in there... that's it thats how they did it ,i must call dylan avery right now Loose Change 4.1

seems like they had a whole floor full of 'batteries' *cough*thermite*couch*
Yeah what floor was that ?

81st floor of the south tower

http://www.rense.com/general75/thrm.htm

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:13 pm

Guys....

I have enjoyed our mock slapfest

I do ... no matter how I come accross ... believe you as indivuals have the right
to believe what ever you want.

Dava · Post by **Dava** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:14 pm

bluelaru wrote:Guys....

I have enjoyed our mock slapfest

I do ... no matter how I come accross ... believe you as indivuals have the right
to believe what ever you want.

Correct, but there will always be something at the back of your mind wanting to know more!

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:16 pm

Did you look at the lincs from the first or second page

I put up a few

somewhere I saw the term....and great diagrams

but I spent some time realling looking at the " Lets roll " site
as this was the first time I had seen this site.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:22 pm

Boner wrote:You're all fucking crackers.

This coming from a 38 year old Xbox live player who doesn't even know how to grow a weed plant that can support it's own weight.

All hail Boner, queen of the forum.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:25 pm

My bad guys

http://letsrollforums.com/

I wondered around....Total Eclips ..... Birdy Gallery

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:26 pm

Your only 38

joeuk · Post by **joeuk** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:43 pm

whatever happened no afghanis invaded your sick arse country like u did to them shame on you

the blame for 9 11 lies at the bushes door

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:53 pm

joeuk wrote:whatever happened no afghanis invaded your sick arse country like u did to them shame on you

Try not to ignore the fact that theyr'e fighting right along with British troops.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:55 pm

911 Happened to keep Bushy II in office...otherwise the Afgan/Iraq thing wouldent have happened.... he wasent looking likly to be re-elected ... and there was an agenda.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 05:59 pm

Least we forget

what business were in those buildings

What records were kept in those buildings

bleak · Post by **bleak** » Tue 13th Jul 2010 06:07 pm

Its easy to fall into the trap of seeing things in black and white eg. it was either an inside job, or it was Bin Laden. I think its much more complicated than that. I don't pretend to know the truth, but I am convinced that there is more to 9/11 than the official story. There are too many missing pieces.

What about the possibility that the govt knew about the attack and let it happen? ie. the official story is completely true, it really was terrorist hijackers, and the buildings fell from fire damage. In this scenario, the government doesn't have to lie per se, they just have to act dumb and pretend they didn't see the warnings.

Another scenario is, they knew there was a terrorist attack going ahead, so they planned their own false flag operations to ride on the back of the real attacks. For example, maybe the twin tower events were the real deal, but WTC7 and the Pentagon were false flag. I'm not saying this is the case, but it would help to explain the mess of conflicting information. If they can prove that at least one of the attacks was carried out by "terrorists", thats enough.

DC · Post by DC » Tue 13th Jul 2010 06:37 pm

Boner wrote:You're all fucking crackers.

Can't wait for DC to see this thread.

You put it perfectly yerself. ffs They're talking to Blue and Skanky like they have a clue what day of the week it is.....Thanks, but erm...no thanks.