Page 2 of 9
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 07:58 pm
by Kingdoc
Ive only used an qtr in the last couple of weeks,If its quality you wont need much anyways
.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 07:59 pm
by chigusa
bluelaru wrote: its SUBJECTIVE
no it isn't. due to the fact that weed is sold in measured amounts in amsterdam, the amount of weed one smokes while there is easily calculated. the individual's experience of or ability to smoke the weed purchased makes no difference at all.
of course you may well be making reference to the subjective theory of value as applied to an amount of weed smoked in amsterdam. in which case i would be very interested to read more of your thoughts on the subject.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:04 pm
by bluelaru
What dose the amount SOLD
have anything to do with HOW SOMEONE REACTS TO IT
You'r wrong Chigger
Thats just plain stupid
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:14 pm
by uncledave
bluelaru wrote:Why would you ask such a stupid question
Its a set up for the LIGHTWEIGHTS to bragg
Like artwork ... or singing ..... its SUBJECTIVE
Sorry if the question offended you. I was just curious, that was all.
And I agree that it is subjective due to everyone's tolerance being different.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:14 pm
by Dava
Kingdoc wrote:Ive only used an qtr in the last couple of weeks,If its quality you wont need much anyways
.
what????
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:22 pm
by chigusa
bluelaru wrote:What dose the amount SOLD
have anything to do with HOW SOMEONE REACTS TO IT
You'r wrong Chigger
Thats just plain stupid
the question was how much do you smoke, not how do you react to it.
so my observation remains valid.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:24 pm
by DC
"How much do you need/have to smoke...when you're in Amsterdam?." is subjective.
"How much do you smoke....when in Amsterdam?." Is basic maths.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:25 pm
by chigusa
you only read the first three words in my post didn't you, blu.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:32 pm
by Kingdoc
Dava wrote:Kingdoc wrote:Ive only used an qtr in the last couple of weeks,If its quality you wont need much anyways
.
what????
Yea i am down to an 8th per week
,I had to man! it was costing me a shedload of money + my health was starting to suffer as well,I was getting pains in my chest + a smokers cough & i havent smoked for about 15+ years now,I was starting to cough up lumps of just about every colour near enough
,A 20 quid purchase is more than enough to keep the wolf from my door like! & i am glad ive brought it under control & back to manageable levels again.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:44 pm
by bluelaru
Its a set up for the LIGHTWEIGHTS to bragg
I was being a smartass... and making a joke
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:49 pm
by DC
So no apology for chigger then.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:49 pm
by TRANCE
For me it's 1 day of smoking, 1 day off or 1 week of smoking 1 week off or 1 month of smoking, 1 month off, can you see a pattern here? This all works fine for me nowadays, just as long I have time off it and not let the stuff control me but me controlling it, otherwise I'd be at it all the time.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 08:51 pm
by bluelaru
Chiger
as I have said before....LIGHTWEIGHTS,
Can smoke less weed, and therefore think CRAP weed is good, cause they got high.
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 09:00 pm
by bluelaru
NO MY DARLING CUNT... ( DC ) ... no sorry fo the chigger
He's wrong .... getting high ... is subjective to the induvial who is attempting to get high
It dosent matter where you are, how much you buy, or even what you smoke
SINCE YOU FUCKERS WANT TO FIGHT
http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/subjective.htm
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz= ... d=0CBIQkAE
Posted: Wed 28th Jul 2010 09:02 pm
by Mindraker
Duude...
Nothing subjective ine the pure amount of cannabis bought a day. it is excatly Xgms...