Up in smoke! Dutch to ban tourists from buying pot

General discussion about cannabis and coffeeshops.
Post Reply
User avatar
hardboiled
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon 2nd Mar 2009 02:03 am
Location: Canadia

Post by hardboiled »

Marco wrote:
hardboiled wrote:
Marco wrote: anti-socials on the streets
'anti-socials'

wtf exactly is that?
Anti-social is a commonly used Dutch term, encompassing a wide range of behaviors. Its certainly not a right wing (or left) term.

Its quite easy to be sarcastic towards, or belittle the Dutch if they do not find into your perceptions of how they should view foreigners and cannabis tourism....
Hmm. I think I get the idea, and it just sounds like 'anti-social' is simply bullshit for 'gentrification'.

The Dutch certainly don't have a monopoly on that.


User avatar
Marco
Posts: 3017
Joined: Thu 10th Sep 2009 11:12 am
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Marco »

hardboiled wrote:
Marco wrote:
hardboiled wrote: 'anti-socials'

wtf exactly is that?
Anti-social is a commonly used Dutch term, encompassing a wide range of behaviors. Its certainly not a right wing (or left) term.

Its quite easy to be sarcastic towards, or belittle the Dutch if they do not find into your perceptions of how they should view foreigners and cannabis tourism....
Hmm. I think I get the idea, and it just sounds like 'anti-social' is simply bullshit for 'gentrification'.

The Dutch certainly don't have a monopoly on that.
You do not get the idea, as it has zero to do with gentrification, period. In fact, due to the unique way social housing is often placed right inside more 'upscale' neighborhoods, gentrification does not exist here.

Free yourself from a north American worldview if you want to understand this country.
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 3017
Joined: Thu 10th Sep 2009 11:12 am
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Marco »

HasAnyoneSeenMyPipe wrote:You know, a tiny part of me wants this to happen so they can all watch the street dealers add Weed, Hash to their menus and to venture out of the RLD then it will collapse within a year. Polititians really don't know their arse from their elbow, its unworkable.
Cisco is right, all this speculation is pointless. I doubt it would end up being sold on the streets like that in any case. Those street dealers are honestly too stupid and greedy to sell weed, they would rather sell crushed up aspirin as coke and little mints as xtc. Most of them are little fucks who come to scam tourists, the rest are connected to real coke importers and will not be selling low-margin shit like weed (and before anyone jumps down my throat, that opinion is based on personal experience).

Notice street dealers don't sell shrooms? They are way to clueless to sell them and you can't make shit on an eighth of mushrooms compared to a few grams of base or powder (real or fake).
User avatar
hardboiled
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon 2nd Mar 2009 02:03 am
Location: Canadia

Post by hardboiled »

Marco wrote:
Free yourself from a north American worldview if you want to understand this country.
Nice, un-necessary, low grade passive aggression there.

Do a better job of defining of what is meant by anti-social then, rather than what you've given: that its 'a wide range of behaviors'

Still smells like classist bullshit (or, gentrification) to me.
User avatar
spidergawd
Posts: 4420
Joined: Sun 11th May 2008 09:21 pm
Location: The Mars Hotel

Post by spidergawd »

hardboiled wrote:
Marco wrote:
Free yourself from a north American worldview if you want to understand this country.
Nice, un-necessary, low grade passive aggression there.

Do a better job of defining of what is meant by anti-social then, rather than what you've given: that its 'a wide range of behaviors'

Still smells like classist bullshit (or, gentrification) to me.
Anti-social behaviour (with or without hyphen) is behaviour that lacks consideration for others and that may cause damage to society, whether intentionally or through negligence, as opposed to pro-social behaviour, behaviour that helps or benefits society (Berger 2003, p. 302). Criminal and civil laws in various countries offer remedies for anti-social behaviour.
Should have tried wikki'ing the above while you were looking up gentrification mate, not everything prescriptive is a class war conspiracy.
What a long strange trip it is.
User avatar
hardboiled
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon 2nd Mar 2009 02:03 am
Location: Canadia

Post by hardboiled »

wiki what? That 'anti-social' means 'anti-social'? 'Helps or benefits society'? Then current cannabis laws are pro-social? Help me out here.

and I ain't twitchy on the class thing, it just smells like bullshit to me.

Public intoxication - I get that. Public urination, graffitii-ing, violence, vandalism, yeah, I get that.

These things are illegal/unlawful. Prosecute the shit out of it. If you mean this, then say it. If it's more than that, then state it.

To my ear - the term is vague enough for some civil-servant ass to roust people due to arbitrary measures.

That's something that irritates this 'north american's worldview ass.

As a dope smoker - I empathize with anyone or group who gets kicked on because of socio-economics/morality/fashion of the day. All people are equal to me, and should be treated as such.

just trying to understand why the vague term, and inability/reluctance to define it.
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 3017
Joined: Thu 10th Sep 2009 11:12 am
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Marco »

hardboiled wrote:wiki what? That 'anti-social' means 'anti-social'? 'Helps or benefits society'? Then current cannabis laws are pro-social? Help me out here.

and I ain't twitchy on the class thing, it just smells like bullshit to me.

Public intoxication - I get that. Public urination, graffitii-ing, violence, vandalism, yeah, I get that.

These things are illegal/unlawful. Prosecute the shit out of it. If you mean this, then say it. If it's more than that, then state it.

To my ear - the term is vague enough for some civil-servant ass to roust people due to arbitrary measures.

That's something that irritates this 'north american's worldview ass.

As a dope smoker - I empathize with anyone or group who gets kicked on because of socio-economics/morality/fashion of the day. All people are equal to me, and should be treated as such.

just trying to understand why the vague term, and inability/reluctance to define it.
You want to know why I was passive-aggressive? Because quite frankly, it can get tiresome to debate (relatively) minor things like what a word means with (no offense) a weed tourist. Important things are happening in NL that are changing it for the worse. But the word and meaning of anti-social behavior is well established and used by people and politicians on the left and right.

I used the word anti-social behavior because it is a Dutch phrase, used by everyone from coffeeshop owners, local resident up to politicians.

Your little hissytfit on 'class warefare' simply does not make sense in the light of Dutch society (hence your North American worldview). Class plays a relatively small part in Dutch culture. This is quite obvious if you live and work here for a while. Class exists, but on a tiny level compared to the UK or US. The issue with coffeeshops at the borders is NOT ABOUT CLASS. Its about issues that matter to the people who live in the border towns. And for you to simply dismiss their concerns based on your stoner-notion on how people are in Canada is a big waste of time.

The reason I post about politics of the Netherlands on ACD is I think people find it interesting, especially those who come here often. The political situation obviously closely related to what will happen in the CS scene, but overall its a lot more important in terms of what type of society will exist here in 5, 10 or 15 years (when some of us will still be living here). And its only my opinion, by the way. But I am constantly interacting with the Dutch and ask them all time about what is happening and will happen.

How about you step out of the echo-chamber (saw you deleted that post, btw) and move beyond semantics to try and understand why the border town issue is fucking up the CS scene for the rest of us. Peace
Cisco
Posts: 6721
Joined: Mon 16th Mar 2009 04:14 pm

Post by Cisco »

anti social behaviour a Dutch term ? wtf ? surely its a term used by the majority of English speaking countries ? thats why in England you have ASBO`s Anti Social Behaviour order :shock: :wink:
-
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 3017
Joined: Thu 10th Sep 2009 11:12 am
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Marco »

cisco wrote:anti social behaviour a Dutch term ? wtf ? surely its a term used by the majority of English speaking countries ? thats why in England you have ASBO`s Anti Social Behaviour order :shock: :wink:
Yes, I mean its a commonly used phrase here, but often used in discussion of the border CS scene.
User avatar
Epsilon
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu 14th Apr 2005 10:47 am
Location: Some Dark Holler
Contact:

Post by Epsilon »

Thanks for your updates Marco . Keep 'em coming if you will .
Cisco
Posts: 6721
Joined: Mon 16th Mar 2009 04:14 pm

Post by Cisco »

Marco wrote:
cisco wrote:anti social behaviour a Dutch term ? wtf ? surely its a term used by the majority of English speaking countries ? thats why in England you have ASBO`s Anti Social Behaviour order :shock: :wink:
Yes, I mean its a commonly used phrase here, but often used in discussion of the border CS scene.

What is the phrase in Dutch ? or is it just used in English ?
-
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 3017
Joined: Thu 10th Sep 2009 11:12 am
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Marco »

cisco wrote:
Marco wrote:
cisco wrote:anti social behaviour a Dutch term ? wtf ? surely its a term used by the majority of English speaking countries ? thats why in England you have ASBO`s Anti Social Behaviour order :shock: :wink:
Yes, I mean its a commonly used phrase here, but often used in discussion of the border CS scene.

What is the phrase in Dutch ? or is it just used in English ?
asocial
User avatar
roker
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon 7th Jul 2008 12:36 pm
Location: Trips to Dam - About 50
Contact:

Post by roker »

asociaal gedrag...
SGawain235
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon 21st Sep 2009 01:06 am

Post by SGawain235 »

Marco wrote:
Important things are happening in NL that are changing it for the worse. But the word and meaning of anti-social behavior is well established and used by people and politicians on the left and right.

I used the word anti-social behavior because it is a Dutch phrase, used by everyone from coffeeshop owners, local resident up to politicians.


The reason I post about politics of the Netherlands on ACD is I think people find it interesting, especially those who come here often. The political situation obviously closely related to what will happen in the CS scene, but overall its a lot more important in terms of what type of society will exist here in 5, 10 or 15 years (when some of us will still be living here). And its only my opinion, by the way. But I am constantly interacting with the Dutch and ask them all time about what is happening and will happen.

How about you step out of the echo-chamber (saw you deleted that post, btw) and move beyond semantics to try and understand why the border town issue is fucking up the CS scene for the rest of us. Peace
Well, usually I try not to put too fine a point on this because I don't have a vast amount of experience in the matter(and, like everything I post here, I could be very wrong).

The political, like the cultural scene, seems to be making a very, VERY hard shift to the conservative side.

I don't want to say "fascist" not because it is a loaded word, but there doesn't seem to be a a real military side of it.

It seems that the Netherlands is becoming progressively less and less welcoming to certain groups of people, regardless of financial benefit.

Immigrants(especially "non-white" immigrants such as Muslims) seem to be one of those less welcome groups of people, as are visitors that aren't there for the most benign of reasons(museum and cuisine seem to be good reasons, prostitutes and weed seem to be less ok).

To be honest, it seems that the Dutch want to have a wealthy, Dutch-only society where people visit for the shopping, history, and culture(and then leave).

This has been a trend that has been happening since(at least) 2000 or so and will probibly not go the other way until the society either collapses in on itself due to calcification(remember all those people that the Dutch don't want around? They are also the people that keep societies current) or outside influence(I said that the Dutch weren't fascist, that doesn't mean that they can't ever be).

In regards to the border towns and CS, I think it is a lot more simple. The border towns want to be left alone and not be bothered with CS. They don't like people who go to their town just for the day to pick up weed and then go home to sell it. They don't get that significant of an economic benefit from the shops or the day visitors that frequent them(also remembering that using cannabis is not really a "Dutch thing").

The thing I can't figure is why the people in the border towns care what people in Amsterdam are doing? Most people who are going into Amsterdam go straight from the airport or drive straight through and usually only see the border towns from their rear-view mirrors.

But then, it could be part of the huge turn to conservative views I was talking about.

So, Marco, how wrong am I here?
Did you think you'd get rid of me that easily?
User avatar
donpacino
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu 15th Jul 2010 07:09 pm
Location: kent. Trips to Amsterdam: 11

Post by donpacino »

http://www.nisnews.nl/public/231110_1.htm

Looks like the tourist sector has got wined of these proposals. Seems like things are gearing up for a fight, once a few more industrys (hotels, travel etc) get wined of it and realise the impact it could have for them.

This is not going to be easy for the government to enforce.
What is thy bidding my master?
Post Reply