Jorge Cervantes also recommends a dark period, even up to a 72hrs, which I think is a bit much, but what do I know when compared to him? Nada!!!treetop wrote:Some people advocate having a dark period of 24 hours between veg and flower to reduce the shock of the light change.Chantra wrote:It's the hopeless optimist in me.Uncle Ron wrote: It won't happen while using a 24/0 light cycle, don't know why you keep thinking it will.![]()
'Clarice' will have to go outside in a couple of weeks as I will be away for a while. Is there any benefit in gradually reducing the light period before putting her outside (to reduce the shock of going to 12/12), or should I just keep her on 24/0? Thanks.
I've tried the 72hr dark period and when I opened the tent, all of the plants looked really pathetic. All of the fan leaves had drooped to a near down vertical position, and the branches had drooped severely as well.
Although the plants recovered, I don't think I'll do again. 24hrs ok, but 72hrs is not for me.
Redeyesman, what are you on about with that timetable of yours?
I still can't figure out why you would want to do that, doesn't make any sense to me, but then again not much does.
I'm not sure if there are any benefits to gradually reducing the light cycle as described. My opinion is that it unnecessarily lengthens the grow time by several weeks.
As I've stated above, and many times throughout the Forum - what do I know!?
Just my opinion, others may and will vary.
Happy farming...


