TwoCanucks wrote:What a scene Amsterdam will become should all the weed tourism is isolated there.
Well, I only know about Venlo, which is a small city with only <150k people. But is has a cheap train connection (like the Metro in A'dam) to the Rhine-Ruhr-Area of Germany and has traditionally been a major destinaton for drug tourists. A report on public television once called the train the "Drug Express" in a documentary

But before the Wietpas it was OK, with only the odd street dealer at the station now and then.
Anyway, now you are being chatted up frequently for ANY kind of drugs, have kids aged 12 or so selling weed and groups of rather young dealers on every major square in the city. The best of the bunch were a group of teenagers, trying to sell weed to a german camera team doing a "100days with the Wietpas" documentary - not with a hidden camera, mind you, but with a huge old-school shoulder-mounted thing. Locals are pissed because of drug tourists asking them to shop on their behalf. But businesses have hardly suffered, because Venlo is so close that it's mainly buy-and-fly. And of course 2 out of 5 shops are already closed.
For A'dam: Do you remember the old days in the RLD with dealers on every bridge trying to shamelessly chat you up "Pssst, hashish, cocain, heroin, LSD?", I think it would be like that, but all over the centrum and canals. Street dealers would be mainly minors due to juvenile law. And of course in A'dam tourism would suffer more because people tend to stay overnight, have to eat, etc. Coffeeshop-hotels would be especially hard hit and most coffeeshops would close, those in the centrum suffering the most.
To summarize, it would be a desaster for the city, that's why the major and council are opposed.