Amsterdam Coffeeshop Directory Forums

ZBeebs wrote:
It doesn't do any such thing, Slip and Sal is just being a troll.

I'm not the one who thinks who knows everything. Did ya do your little experiment? cause I did. I here a lot of I know this and no proof.

Paper will ignite with a flame of 218 degrees celcius. So you can get paper around a cigarette very hot. The laser temperature gauge I used said I heated the cigarette to 140 degrees celcius. This is 15 degrees over the vaporisation point of tobacco. What you say to that?

Slip & Sal wrote: This is 15 degrees over the vaporisation point of tobacco. What you say to that?

i say that you originally claimed that the process got rid of the nicotine contained in tobacco, now you say that the tobacco itself is vaporised. if that's the case then why not just chuck a fag in the bin and make a pure joint?

stanleymoon wrote:

Slip & Sal wrote: This is 15 degrees over the vaporisation point of tobacco. What you say to that?

i say that you originally claimed that the process got rid of the nicotine contained in tobacco, now you say that the tobacco itself is vaporised. if that's the case then why not just chuck a fag in the bin and make a pure joint?

This. Right here.

What's the point of using tobacco if not the nicotine?

Presumably to allow all those lovely cancerous tars to coat your lungs. Or for the taste. But I'd be sceptical about claims that this process eliminates the nicotine.

I have tobacco with hash joints. I dont smoke cigs but I weirdly prefer tobacco to any of the weird mixes you get.

You are a talking with a stoner, yes I did say to bacco, I meant nicotine, but you all knew that as well. Fair suck of the sav boys. I did the experiement. Nicotine vaporisers I think. Smoking weed coats your lungs in tar.