Re: The New Amsterdam Block Hash (Amsterdam Genetics)
Posted: Sat 1st Oct 2016 07:22 am
bump
coffeeshopdirect.com/forum
http://www.coffeeshopdirect.com/forum/
DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote:I see lots of level-5 fuckery about in this thread!
First of all, some people need to hop off their soapboxes. If you buy at CS's (in general) but then direct your hatred towards one for reasons that characterize all the others as well, then you're not being very pragmatic. If you're gonna bitch that much then don't frequent CS's or NL at all, it's that fucking simple! Hypocrisy is not a wise look for you, 'nuff said!
Secondly, sorry Macky but gotta disagree Boerejongnes block hashes shit all over a good bit of the competition, including that trans-Himalayan (only hash I ever bought that busted my screen rather than deliver me rosin when pressed, ABSOLUTE SHIT!). Opinions, opinions, opinions, but I'd wager a few people would agree with me on this one - though Kadinsky is a solid hash-spot all things said.
With regard to the trolls I try to bite my tongue, and I'm not averse to newcomers, but some people post a A LOT of bullshit, and I've seen that you Lemming have even gone through the efforts (at times) of removing the accounts of some of the more obvious ones (or at least it appeared that way). I'll try to hold my tongue better in the future but my patience is thin for those who use the "dumb-advice-poster-query" scenario (among other tactics), because it's a staple in the troll's arsenal of pathetic tactics (I've hung around enough internet-forums to recognize bs when I see it).
DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote: and fuck all the haters, they're mad because you guys are doing big things now!
KeyMonCha wrote:DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote: and fuck all the haters, they're mad because you guys are doing big things now!
I don't think anybody would be mad at that, would they?
Glad you had fun, btw..... Looking forward to the reviews, and i'll be trying all their hashes in April; so long as no one shoots the shop.
DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote:
Um apparently competition, CS's be gettin' shot-up round these parts!
...Which is odd because;DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote:Four invitees, all registered to this forum but Marok and I were the only more regular posters. The other two are registered but very new/infrequent posters, ...
So, who were the other two? ...Since they're (imho) morally obligated to give a full review of their experience, i'd have expected at least one of them to have popped up by now?! ...Are they infrequent, newbies? ...Or knowledgeable and serious, with a comprehensive outlook on the cannabis industry?Amsterdam Genetics wrote:Four people were chosen for the testing of our blocks, we tried to pick people who we thought would give a fair and objective opinion through there knowledge of products and that also have a serious and comprehensive outlook on the cannabis industry at present.
DeLeuksteNUGS16 wrote:They were initially invited through similar selection through FB they did for another feedback, Q&A sampling thing. Other people on the forum were invited but as you can see there was a shortage of regular posters that were both ...errr ....a.) receptive to the idea; and b.) available/in town ya know made it difficult as many can't just come on short notice even if from the UK, where the majority are located...