3 days later............

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 05:47 am

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295529,00.html

DC · Post by DC » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 01:13 pm

Allies?....this time they're on their own.

BigRobb · Post by **BigRobb** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:29 pm

Ah Bush...

apz · Post by **apz** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:40 pm

Nothing wrong with being prepared. The US military has MANY plans for different situations.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:44 pm

Not according to our President

APZ.....W says we arent very good.....

SEE I TOLD YOU .... APTLY NAMED

I MAY BE ANGRY.....BUT THANK GOD NOT AS STUPID AS YOU

BigRobb · Post by **BigRobb** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:46 pm

Do you think they have plans to go into Saudi Arabia? That must be the next target after Iran, Jordan.... Oh wait...

apz · Post by **apz** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:53 pm

bluelaru wrote:Not according to our President

APZ.....W says we arent very good.....

SEE I TOLD YOU .... APTLY NAMED

I MAY BE ANGRY.....BUT THANK GOD NOT AS STUPID AS YOU

What is it that you think APZ means?

What is it that you're angry about?

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:38 pm

apz wrote:The US military has MANY plans for different situations.

apz · Post by **apz** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:42 pm

OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:44 pm

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:45 pm

apz wrote:OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?

So blowing up their entire military is the answer? How many lives? How many people just doing a job?

My ol' ma' always told me never to answer a question with another question but in this instance I feel as though you're asking the wrong one.

apz · Post by **apz** » Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:59 pm

Neldo wrote:
apz wrote:OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?
So blowing up their entire military is the answer? How many lives? How many people just doing a job?

My ol' ma' always told me never to answer a question with another question but in this instance I feel as though you're asking the wrong one.

Anytime there is something anywhere, that may threaten the USA, I guarantee you that the military makes multiple plans to react to that threat. Those plans most likely take into account the loss of life. Look at the US action in Iraq, do you think we just threw everything we had at them or did we try to minimize the loss of life?

How many lives could a terrorist destroy with a nuke? How long would Israel survive if Iran had a nuke? Should we wait for that to happen when the president of Iran has already stated that destroying Israel is one of his countries goals?

I don't have the answers, but to be upset because the US has a plan to destroy Iran's military infrastructure is silly.

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:09 am

I dunno how anyone could defend a "plan" like that... who's running the military planning out there, Officer Barbrady?? Possibly one of the worst military maneouvers I think I've ever heard of... they're pretty much talking about carpet bombing a large section of a country with "no pinpoint strikes".

It's crazy talk - dark ages material, certainly not the type of strategy used by an advanced armed force. You can't argue with that logic imo. Of course I realise that action must be taken if there's no halt in nuclear enrichment, but just fucking bomb the shit right out the place? That sounds like a child playing a video game.

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:11 am

apz wrote:How long would Israel survive if Iran had a nuke?

Somehow I don't think that's the concern of the US government.

user54321 · Post by **user54321** » Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:13 am

apz wrote:to be upset because the US has a plan to destroy Iran's military infrastructure is silly.

Again I draw reference to "no pinpoint strikes".