Page 1 of 4

3 days later............

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 05:47 am
by user54321

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 01:13 pm
by DC
Allies?....this time they're on their own.

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:29 pm
by BigRobb
Ah Bush...

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:40 pm
by apz
Nothing wrong with being prepared. The US military has MANY plans for different situations.

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:44 pm
by bluelaru
Not according to our President

APZ.....W says we arent very good.....


SEE I TOLD YOU .... APTLY NAMED

I MAY BE ANGRY.....BUT THANK GOD NOT AS STUPID AS YOU

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:46 pm
by BigRobb
Do you think they have plans to go into Saudi Arabia? That must be the next target after Iran, Jordan.... Oh wait...

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 09:53 pm
by apz
bluelaru wrote:Not according to our President

APZ.....W says we arent very good.....


SEE I TOLD YOU .... APTLY NAMED

I MAY BE ANGRY.....BUT THANK GOD NOT AS STUPID AS YOU
What is it that you think APZ means?

What is it that you're angry about?

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:38 pm
by user54321
apz wrote:The US military has MANY plans for different situations.
:roll:

Image

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:42 pm
by apz
OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:44 pm
by user54321
Image

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:45 pm
by user54321
apz wrote:OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?
So blowing up their entire military is the answer? How many lives? How many people just doing a job?

My ol' ma' always told me never to answer a question with another question but in this instance I feel as though you're asking the wrong one.

Posted: Mon 3rd Sep 2007 11:59 pm
by apz
Neldo wrote:
apz wrote:OK, so if Iran develops nuclear weapons you guys aren't concerned?
So blowing up their entire military is the answer? How many lives? How many people just doing a job?

My ol' ma' always told me never to answer a question with another question but in this instance I feel as though you're asking the wrong one.
Anytime there is something anywhere, that may threaten the USA, I guarantee you that the military makes multiple plans to react to that threat. Those plans most likely take into account the loss of life. Look at the US action in Iraq, do you think we just threw everything we had at them or did we try to minimize the loss of life?

How many lives could a terrorist destroy with a nuke? How long would Israel survive if Iran had a nuke? Should we wait for that to happen when the president of Iran has already stated that destroying Israel is one of his countries goals?

I don't have the answers, but to be upset because the US has a plan to destroy Iran's military infrastructure is silly.

Posted: Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:09 am
by user54321
I dunno how anyone could defend a "plan" like that... who's running the military planning out there, Officer Barbrady?? Possibly one of the worst military maneouvers I think I've ever heard of... they're pretty much talking about carpet bombing a large section of a country with "no pinpoint strikes".

It's crazy talk - dark ages material, certainly not the type of strategy used by an advanced armed force. You can't argue with that logic imo. Of course I realise that action must be taken if there's no halt in nuclear enrichment, but just fucking bomb the shit right out the place? That sounds like a child playing a video game.

Posted: Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:11 am
by user54321
apz wrote:How long would Israel survive if Iran had a nuke?
Somehow I don't think that's the concern of the US government.

Posted: Tue 4th Sep 2007 12:13 am
by user54321
apz wrote:to be upset because the US has a plan to destroy Iran's military infrastructure is silly.
Again I draw reference to "no pinpoint strikes".