Amsterdam Coffeeshop Directory Forums

Sh@dy, yes, it was Dampkring where she worked for the month.

I think you'll find she "worked" there for the duration of that one piece to camera - Dampkring have too much to lose by allowing half-witted journalists behind the counter for long.

BBC Haze

Well, all in all it wasn't that bad.

Downfalls were :-

Her ignoring good advice.

Comparing neat THC to Strong weed.

Not making more of the health benefits.

The absense of anyone bright being interviewed on the street.

Does anyone know if thc & cannabinoids are extractable to be used in an injection?

Boner wrote:Does anyone know if thc & cannabinoids are extractable to be used in an injection?

I have certainly never heard of it, also defo not something that i would like to try!Cant stand needles!!

I had thought the BBC was somewhat unbiased, or much less than mainstream American Media. This sounds like something on FOX.

any site where you can watch the video? i cant watch it on BBC because i am not from the UK and i didnt find it on youtube

Hey shady i found this link but is on the BBC Iplayer dont know if you have to be from the uk to watch it.

It is a hour long though. To be honest i wouldnt even bother!

geoffk wrote:I had thought the BBC was somewhat unbiased, or much less than mainstream American Media. This sounds like something on FOX.

the bbc network is (or at least was) slightly more impartial than sky/itv. of course no media organisation will ever be completely neutral.

then bbc three came along. it's schedule was very poor at the beginning, so to fill it they used various 'scientific' scare mongering docu-soaps like you see on american tv. "The man who weighed 1 million stone!" "Honey we're killing our kids!" "Super Skunk turned my baby into a snake so i shot it!" etc.

BBC3 cannot be viewed with the same serious tone as 1, 2 & 4. it's starting to remind me of those cable channels you guys got over there. where any joe can record a nonsense program in their home and put it to air for people to believe.

The BBC is a glove puppet for the government due to the way its funded imo.

Boner wrote:The BBC is a glove puppet for the government due to the way its funded imo.

hey_bobby wrote:

geoffk wrote:I had thought the BBC was somewhat unbiased, or much less than mainstream American Media. This sounds like something on FOX.

the bbc network is (or at least was) slightly more impartial than sky/itv. of course no media organisation will ever be completely neutral.

then bbc three came along. it's schedule was very poor at the beginning, so to fill it they used various 'scientific' scare mongering docu-soaps like you see on american tv. "The man who weighed 1 million stone!" "Honey we're killing our kids!" "Super Skunk turned my baby into a snake so i shot it!" etc.

BBC3 cannot be viewed with the same serious tone as 1, 2 & 4. it's starting to remind me of those cable channels you guys got over there. where any joe can record a nonsense program in their home and put it to air for people to believe.

I see now, much like how our TV has turned news into an infomercial.

Boner wrote:The BBC is a glove puppet for the government due to the way its funded imo.

Exactly, and also what I was saying about The Royal Charter a few posts back. It was setup by The Charter and I think that makes it highly sus when it comes to any real programming.

and one spliff makes you crazy...jump out windows etc...


all sounds like


complete bollox

Could one of you UK folks burn this documentary to CD/DVD and send it over, Alsjeblieft.

Try this mate