Cannabis: To Ban or Not to Ban
Posted: Fri 9th May 2008 05:55 am
Cannabis: To Ban or Not to Ban
Tolerant Drugs Policy a Mistake?
According to a poll conducted by the Telegraaf newspaper, 71% of people say that the current tolerance policy regarding soft drugs needs to be changed in the Tweede Kamer (Lower Chambers of government)
Due to pressure from the Tweede Kamer, the cabinet are now going to review the drugs policy of the last 30 years. The results will form a new ‘drugsnota‘ that will be ready in a years time.
Most of those that participated in the poll don’t see why it has to take a year. Around 70% reacted negatively or very negatively about the current drugs policy regarding soft drugs for the past thirty years.
“Smoking joints is allowed, the sale of cannabis in coffeeshops is tolerated, but the cultivation of weed is rigorously fought. How bent can the policy be?. Typical Dutch. Try to explain it to a foreigner”, was the reaction of one participant. “Every Monday I have students that have spent the weekend drinking and smoking joints. They aren’t completetly in the same world and are stressed out and irritated”, said a reader from the education system.
But there are also those with a different view.”You can only keep soft drugs out of the illegal circuit by having a tolerance policy. This will lead to less dealing, cheaper drugs and less criminality”, said one participant. “A ban on soft drugs will bring people to street dealers who also offer hard drugs with all that goes along with it”, said another respondent.
Amongst those asked there were those that said the current policy should be scrapped and just legalise cannabis altogether, and concentrate on attacking hard drugs use in a much stronger way.
Nearly two thirds of those questioned found that the current seperation of hard and soft drugs is no longer applicable this day and age. The quality of soft drugs has increased in leaps and bounds the past few years where it has now reached a point where experts say it now has addictive properties. “The difference between soft and hard drugs is now extremely vague”, said an ex dealer. Around two thirds of people now believe that soft drugs must be banned just like hard drugs are now.
Three quarters of people are against smoking of joints in public and compare it with ‘parksex‘. “I don’t want to even think about my children seeing such things going on. Only in Holland”, was the view of one woman. Nearly 3/4 are calling for a ban on smoking in public.
2/3’s of people are in agreement with the tackling of ‘growshops‘, although many are doubtful about it’s effectiveness because most of the things needed to grow weed at home can be bought in garden centres.
2/3’s say that the drugs policy of the last thirty years has had a bad effect on the health of the nation. 52% say that Holland would be better if it had had the same policies as neighbouring countries, and 2/3’s believe the policy must be on a European level being dictated by the EU.
From all those questioned, 37% said they had smoked a joint and 12% admitted to using hard drugs. “A happy smoker is no unrest causer”, said one of them.
Source
Tolerant Drugs Policy a Mistake?
According to a poll conducted by the Telegraaf newspaper, 71% of people say that the current tolerance policy regarding soft drugs needs to be changed in the Tweede Kamer (Lower Chambers of government)
Due to pressure from the Tweede Kamer, the cabinet are now going to review the drugs policy of the last 30 years. The results will form a new ‘drugsnota‘ that will be ready in a years time.
Most of those that participated in the poll don’t see why it has to take a year. Around 70% reacted negatively or very negatively about the current drugs policy regarding soft drugs for the past thirty years.
“Smoking joints is allowed, the sale of cannabis in coffeeshops is tolerated, but the cultivation of weed is rigorously fought. How bent can the policy be?. Typical Dutch. Try to explain it to a foreigner”, was the reaction of one participant. “Every Monday I have students that have spent the weekend drinking and smoking joints. They aren’t completetly in the same world and are stressed out and irritated”, said a reader from the education system.
But there are also those with a different view.”You can only keep soft drugs out of the illegal circuit by having a tolerance policy. This will lead to less dealing, cheaper drugs and less criminality”, said one participant. “A ban on soft drugs will bring people to street dealers who also offer hard drugs with all that goes along with it”, said another respondent.
Amongst those asked there were those that said the current policy should be scrapped and just legalise cannabis altogether, and concentrate on attacking hard drugs use in a much stronger way.
Nearly two thirds of those questioned found that the current seperation of hard and soft drugs is no longer applicable this day and age. The quality of soft drugs has increased in leaps and bounds the past few years where it has now reached a point where experts say it now has addictive properties. “The difference between soft and hard drugs is now extremely vague”, said an ex dealer. Around two thirds of people now believe that soft drugs must be banned just like hard drugs are now.
Three quarters of people are against smoking of joints in public and compare it with ‘parksex‘. “I don’t want to even think about my children seeing such things going on. Only in Holland”, was the view of one woman. Nearly 3/4 are calling for a ban on smoking in public.
2/3’s of people are in agreement with the tackling of ‘growshops‘, although many are doubtful about it’s effectiveness because most of the things needed to grow weed at home can be bought in garden centres.
2/3’s say that the drugs policy of the last thirty years has had a bad effect on the health of the nation. 52% say that Holland would be better if it had had the same policies as neighbouring countries, and 2/3’s believe the policy must be on a European level being dictated by the EU.
From all those questioned, 37% said they had smoked a joint and 12% admitted to using hard drugs. “A happy smoker is no unrest causer”, said one of them.
Source