Amsterdam Coffeeshop Directory Forums

has anyone else noticed the sinster masonic symbols spread throughout dam. The most blatant would have to be the monument on dam square, when on koningsplein aim to walk towards tweed (spui) & the building on your right at the top has a very strange symbol, the building is fairly new 60s - 70s so it cant be blamed on a bygon era of gothic symbols(like old churches), also when walking down singel alot of the old houses on their gables have similar markings, check them out, if u spot any more please post.

I thought April Fool's Day jokes could only be played before midday on April 1st?

Ive checked the one on the monument and it is not a mason mark. But if you look at an ariel photo of it, there is "the eye". This eye is on more monuments and buildings, than any other symbol, but no one realises. The mark of the neworld order, the same symbol on the dollar bill.
But this design has been built into popular culture for hundreds of years.

i though 1on dam square was masonic symbol its the obelisk which goes hand in hand with the dome of oud kerk, same as in D.C the obelisk goes with senate capital dome, in london you have cleopatras needle with st.pauls, a more modern version is canary wharf and the millenium dome, u should check out david ickes

ive got a funny clip of my cousin doing a alex jones spoof on the 1on koningsplein, il put a link soon

Heres that link, he does actually sound similar to A jones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC_i9enbV-k

youtube had all that stuff....as far as i care they can stencil 666,eyes,triangles or what ever,where-ever as long as they leave the coffeeshops the hell alone

echc1 wrote:youtube had all that stuff....as far as i care they can stencil 666,eyes,triangles or what ever,where-ever as long as they leave the coffeeshops the hell alone

what u mean i only posted it last nite, your right though as long as they stick to their stencils & leave cs's alone

it was under the general heading illuminatae on youtube ,watched it months ago........either that or someone made a series of vids very similar about the architecture in amsterdam....personally i don't care for New World Order as i'll always be an anarchist at heart....no-one has the right to control the wills or lives of others but i do think Orwell was right,just got the dates wrong....ironic as he was a policeman in burma for the colonial administration

echc1 wrote:it was under the general heading illuminatae on youtube ,watched it months ago........either that or someone made a series of vids very similar about the architecture in amsterdam....personally i don't care for New World Order as i'll always be an anarchist at heart....no-one has the right to control the wills or lives of others but i do think Orwell was right,just got the dates wrong....ironic as he was a policeman in burma for the colonial administration

& his dad an opium peddlar in india working for the empire LOL

quality to know the old empire were just organised drug dealers hahahaha still we did get a cheap lease on hong kong for a few years out of it all....ahh the opium wars....nothing changes,just the names for the govt. and corporate greed....strangely gordo brown had his holiday in orwell home town of southwold last year....hmmmm

As Freud said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar!"

Having interesting symbols on a building does NOT neccessarily have to have any deeper meaning.

Also, even if the symbol was meant to have a deeper meaning, a symbol's meaning can change over time. For example, the swastika is an ancient Indian symbol, but after the Nazis appropriated it, it now has sinister meaning. I have been in building's built in the 1910 era (20 years before the Nazi's ever existed), and they had this amazing inlaid tilework featuring a backward (opposite orientation to Nazi version) swastika.

Interpretted with today's idea of symbols, this floor might be considered atrocious, but in 1910, it had no more meaning than as a simple decoration.

Ive analized a load of videos on youtube and the symbols have not come out in decent quality, so I will check it out when I go over in the summer.
oud kerk is that gothic looking church in the red light district, if that oblisk does go hand in hand, I would have thought it would have been orientated to be on a lay line (monuments usally run exactly in front or diagonal to churches (same with DC, london and many other famous landmarks).
As I said before the illuminatae, masons and other cults have their symbols embeaded into buidings which have been built over the last few hunded years (They are usally on buildings of importance or are genrally expensive sites). There is quite a few videos on the tube about illuminate and the masons kicking up a fuss over NWO, but the dates are all wrong.
But.....Some of the buildings which are in amsterdam where built in the later 1800's, during a time when eqyptian and roman styled buildings where in fashion. But the "Eye" is very destinctive, as it is not the standard "eye of osirous" (soz my spelling is really bad).
The backwards swastika was used in nortern africa during the late 1800's- early 1900's, apprently it ment peace. (counter clockwise).
Just like two fingers up in WW1 meant peace, WW2 it ment "V for victory" and now it means.....off.

.... As I said before the illuminatae, masons and other cults......

One person's religion is another person's cult.

It took about 400 years before the Roman Catholic church went from cult to religion, as, finally, the Roman emperor adopted Christianity and then enforced it on his people.

The cross was an execution intstrument, and they (or the cross image) seem to be everywhere. Imagine, if there were iamges of the hangman's noose, or firing squad's rifles, or the lethal inection's needles. Those would appear quite sinister, no?

Images can have different meaning for diferent cultures. For instance, the raven is welcome symbol in some cultures, but, in others, it is a sign of an omen.

I think most of the symbols on buildings had more to do with artistic merit, or homages to mythology, than to anything else.

Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote:

.... As I said before the illuminatae, masons and other cults......

One person's religion is another person's cult.

It took about 400 years before the Roman Catholic church went from cult to religion, as, finally, the Roman emperor adopted Christianity and then enforced it on his people.

The cross was an execution intstrument, and they (or the cross image) seem to be everywhere. Imagine, if there were iamges of the hangman's noose, or firing squad's rifles, or the lethal inection's needles. Those would appear quite sinister, no?

Images can have different meaning for diferent cultures. For instance, the raven is welcome symbol in some cultures, but, in others, it is a sign of an omen.

I think most of the symbols on buildings had more to do with artistic merit, or homages to mythology, than to anything else.

Just as Gooble says, symbols are interpreted in different ways by different cultures.

I have an interest in symbols, if you dig deeper it's amazing how many religions and cults are copies of ancient cultures thousands of years older than any modern religion. Many think that all religions and symbols originate back to Sumeria.

For example, on this video the symbol of DNA was used 6000 used ago by the Sumerians:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BToUxSi- ... re=related

lampshade wrote:

Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote:

.... As I said before the illuminatae, masons and other cults......

One person's religion is another person's cult.

It took about 400 years before the Roman Catholic church went from cult to religion, as, finally, the Roman emperor adopted Christianity and then enforced it on his people.

The cross was an execution intstrument, and they (or the cross image) seem to be everywhere. Imagine, if there were iamges of the hangman's noose, or firing squad's rifles, or the lethal inection's needles. Those would appear quite sinister, no?

Images can have different meaning for diferent cultures. For instance, the raven is welcome symbol in some cultures, but, in others, it is a sign of an omen.

I think most of the symbols on buildings had more to do with artistic merit, or homages to mythology, than to anything else.

Just as Gooble says, symbols are interpreted in different ways by different cultures.

I have an interest in symbols, if you dig deeper it's amazing how many religions and cults are copies of ancient cultures thousands of years older than any modern religion. Many think that all religions and symbols originate back to Sumeria.

For example, on this video the symbol of DNA was used 6000 used ago by the Sumerians:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BToUxSi- ... re=related

Definatly agree with you there lampshade, have you seen zeitgeist