Response from Cancer Research UK re. Rick Simpson's claims

Post Reply
doobydave
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu 28th Aug 2008 03:26 pm
Location: UK

Response from Cancer Research UK re. Rick Simpson's claims

Post by doobydave »

Apparently this is copyrighted and should not be reproduced - but I'm a criminal, what else am I going to do with it?
Thank you for contacting Cancer Research UK. In your email you asked
about research into THC for the treatment of cancer. I hope the
following points will be helpful in answering your question.

Cannabinoids (the group of molecules which are structurally related to
THC) are the active chemical compounds present in some varieties of
cannabis plants which give it psychoactive properties.

Some research studies in the lab have shown that cannabinoids can have
an effect on cancer cells. This work relates to purified cannabinoids
and is still at a relatively early stage.

You can find some of the scientific papers relating to this work by
visiting the PubMed scientific journal search site:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
Searching using the term "cannabinol cancer" brings up a number of
research papers in this field.

Cancer Research UK is investigating the potential of a number of
naturally occurring chemicals for treating cancer, including
cannabinoids. For example, one of our scientists in Bristol is
investigating whether certain cannabinoids could be developed into drugs
for treating bowel cancer.

To date, the vast majority of work in this area has been done on mice or
cells grown in the laboratory. Clinical trials in a large number of
people will be needed to work out whether drugs derived from
cannabinoids could be a safe and effective treatment for people with
cancer. But further research is needed in this area to understand the
effect of cannabinoids on cells before we could begin to test them in
patients.

You may also be interested in some of the following information which
can be found on our patient information website:
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/defau ... 7#research

Research into cannabinoids is promising and Cancer Research UK will
continue to monitor this area of study. However, there are many other
avenues of research that we are actively pursuing to find new ways to
prevent, diagnose and treat cancer. You can find out more about our work
on our News & Resources website:
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer ... tresearch/

I hope you have found this information useful and, once again, thank you
for contacting Cancer Research UK.
I have highlighted two figures of speech which do not give me much faith in this charities' goal to find a cure for cancer.
Finding a patentable cure for cancer seems a different story however.....


User avatar
Sir Niall of Essex-sire
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu 20th Mar 2008 04:38 pm

Post by Sir Niall of Essex-sire »

Sorry Dave but i find it absurd that because CancerUK have questioned if Cannabis is an effective treatment for cancer you say they are not interested in curing cancer. I personally have seen the hard work and benifits this group have caused and find it amazing that because they dont agree with Rick ' cannabis is the cure for everything' Simpson they obviously arent trying to cure cancer at all!

Thats a really strong statement, i hope you have some research to back up why CancerUk arent trying to cure cancer and are just taking all the money donated to them and pissing it up against a wall.
Defeating evil with a thing called love
User avatar
sh@dy
Posts: 2419
Joined: Fri 2nd Mar 2007 12:12 pm

Post by sh@dy »

Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:Sorry Dave but i find it absurd that because CancerUK have questioned if Cannabis is an effective treatment for cancer you say they are not interested in curing cancer. I personally have seen the hard work and benifits this group have caused and find it amazing that because they dont agree with Rick ' cannabis is the cure for everything' Simpson they obviously arent trying to cure cancer at all!

Thats a really strong statement, i hope you have some research to back up why CancerUk arent trying to cure cancer and are just taking all the money donated to them and pissing it up against a wall.
there is one question:
how many years can it take to research this plant? they are telling us the research-thing since.....well let it be 15+ years?
doobydave
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu 28th Aug 2008 03:26 pm
Location: UK

Post by doobydave »

My point, Sir Niall, is that they seem to have completely dismissed trialling any of the naturally occurring cannabinoids, in favour of manipulating some of those compounds.
User avatar
Twichaldinho
Posts: 3830
Joined: Sat 21st Jul 2007 07:08 pm

Post by Twichaldinho »

doobydave wrote:My point, Sir Niall, is that they seem to have completely dismissed trialling any of the naturally occurring cannabinoids, in favour of manipulating some of those compounds.
Yeah, that freaks me out too.
If they are willing to accept that THC ( other cannabiniods are available :lol: ) has a medicinal benifit, surely we already have the most healthy method of consuming it developed? Vapourising?
Why do we need a pharma-backed alternative?
Strange. :?
Endure
ZBeebs
Posts: 1001
Joined: Wed 25th Mar 2009 03:18 am
Location: Outer Space

Post by ZBeebs »

Twichaldinho wrote:
doobydave wrote:My point, Sir Niall, is that they seem to have completely dismissed trialling any of the naturally occurring cannabinoids, in favour of manipulating some of those compounds.
Yeah, that freaks me out too.
If they are willing to accept that THC ( other cannabiniods are available :lol: ) has a medicinal benifit, surely we already have the most healthy method of consuming it developed? Vapourising?
Why do we need a pharma-backed alternative?
Strange. :?
I would think that eating it would be the most healthy method - inhaling vapor, while better for you than inhaling smoke, is not "healthy".
Why drink and drive when you can smoke and fly?
Post Reply