USBONGLORD wrote:my blood can be dried and smoked..or used as barbeque sauce for something different with yer burger.....
i guess this explains the "usbl labs blend" that i saw on the table at tony romas.
Moderators: Balou, Twichaldinho
Really? EVERY SINGLE ONE of the WWI and WWII vets that I knew personally (i.e. both my grandfathers for WWI and many uncles for WWII) thought that, for the most part, all wars were, in the end, unnecessary wastes of lives.disagree with you guys but understand where you are coming from.
In the past years I have been doing a lot of volunteer work with WWII veterans and this has changed my outlook somewhat.
wishing you all a peaceful Sunday.
As usual, you Brits are jumping to conclusions and assuming you knew what I meant, to fulfill your fantasies about Americans.Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote:Really? EVERY SINGLE ONE of the WWI and WWII vets that I knew personally (i.e. both my grandfathers for WWI and many uncles for WWII) thought that, for the most part, all wars were, in the end, unnecessary wastes of lives.disagree with you guys but understand where you are coming from.
In the past years I have been doing a lot of volunteer work with WWII veterans and this has changed my outlook somewhat.
wishing you all a peaceful Sunday.
The cannon fodder are, mainly, young working class men and boys, fighting wars for some imperialistic/corporate interests; interests who will fuck them over once the war is over. I am always ashamed at how many veterans were treated. Scores and scores of them were hived off to the skid rows to live out lives in crappy shitholes. These men were the ones who made the greatest sacrifices for society and when they were no longer use we kicked them in the teeth.
This war, like Iraq, will end in a quagmire and, in addition to bankrupting Western treasuries, will leave Afghanis worse off than they were before. (And has strengthened terrorism to boot. What a complete cock-up!).
That 's my two centivos worth!
I have never met a WWII vet who thought that conflict was a waste of time. Most of the ones that I know, who are still alive, were strongly against the war in Iraq.Kermit wrote:Iraq has nothing to do with it although wrong how happy was the people when he swung. They even executed him, if they did not want change then why did they execute him?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JUL-l6o ... re=related
Afganistan is a harder nut to crack but it is cracking and when it is free from the Taliban the people will be as happy as the people at the end of the video above.
As for the World wars well the vets have the opinion now that it was a waste of lives, this is something that came with age IMO. When it was happening they wanted to fight and protect there familys so they went to war.
My grandad fought in the 2nd and i remember his opinion of it and it was far from a waste of lives. And yes he was cannon fodder as it has been put but he had to do what had to be done.
Support our troops and hope for a safe return they helped give you the life you have today.
Now lets smoke
WWI and WWII were faught by people wanting to protect fundalmental liberities, one of which is freedom of speech. Which we can excerise against the Government and their decisions, if i dont agree with a war and someone dies. I can say the war is fucked, because to follow the army and Government blindly makes you a tool of the system. Furthermore, i would claim that to morn the death of your enemies as you would the death of your own is morally superiour to the alternative.Marco wrote:Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote: As usual, you Brits are jumping to conclusions and assuming you knew what I meant, to fulfill your fantasies about Americans.
As usual you Americans are dodging to question of why your troops mean more than those they are killing?![]()
They are, and in historical terms. I think the British Armed forces has commited more crimes than the American Armed forces.Stanky Danky wrote:Don't act like there aren't Brittish troops in Afghanistan killing people too.Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:
As usual you Americans are dodging to question of why your troops mean more than those they are killing?![]()
I thought we were supposed to be morally superiour to the Taliban? Is comparing our kill count to theirs a good way to justify our actions.Kermit wrote: Edit.. just seen above and we have to face it there will be some unfortunate deaths, but what about the deaths the taliban cause, not just in afganistan but also Pakistan?
How clear to I have to make it: these are my people (and I do not mean race) and my loyalty will remain with them...American, Dutch, French, etc.Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:Marco wrote:Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote: As usual, you Brits are jumping to conclusions and assuming you knew what I meant, to fulfill your fantasies about Americans.
I understand your basic idea Marco, i'm questioning any jusitification you can offer to support it.Marco wrote: How clear to I have to make it: these are my people (and I do not mean race) and my loyalty will remain with them...American, Dutch, French, etc.
I never mentioned that you should not speak out against the war, not one bit. I protested against the Iraq war both in DC and in a foreign country.
Is that not, at the most basic level, suggesting that my support should come first not any criticism i have of the war. Therefore, does it not implyThe lads in Afg. are suffering greatly and they need to hear that the people love them and support them. The first thing out of your mouth when you hear about a dead NATO soldier is not that the war is fucked
I think your very wrong historically and in general. Historically, the Europeans have supported their troops, and in the face of more difficulties than the Americans in WWI and WWII. You have to remember the UK was bombed nightly, this did not stop support of the troops. Because that was a just war which had a point. Not this war that America has started and expects the European community to support it in.In my opinion, to not at least support the troops at a basic level is a bit cowardly and limp-wristed. Both traits that I sadly fin in abundance among many Europeans these days (and I have lived over here for 11 of my 41 years lol
I am not comparing i am just pointing out they happily kill innocent civillians too and not by accident. They also care little about them otherwise why hide within them.Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:I thought we were supposed to be morally superiour to the Taliban? Is comparing our kill count to theirs a good way to justify our actions.Kermit wrote: Edit.. just seen above and we have to face it there will be some unfortunate deaths, but what about the deaths the taliban cause, not just in afganistan but also Pakistan?
Something that strikes me is that do the people of Afghanistan want our interference? What if they wanted to be under Taliban control? Do we have a right to interfer?