Sex and Satan in a Disney Movie?

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 9th May 2010 11:53 pm

Here's a cute little pic I stumbled across while doing a little digging.

DC · Post by DC » Mon 10th May 2010 09:28 pm

This is actually a bullshit, bullshit mason conspiracy (bollox) thread. C'mon Skank, put some fukin effort in will ya. I'll help ya out a little, either that or fry yer head a little further.....

cantona7 · Post by **cantona7** » Mon 10th May 2010 09:41 pm

DC wrote:This is actually a bullshit, bullshit mason conspiracy (bollox) thread. C'mon Skank, put some fukin effort in will ya. I'll help ya out a little, either that or fry yer head a little further.....

DC · Post by DC » Mon 10th May 2010 10:49 pm

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 16th May 2010 05:54 am

Don't look now, but I think I see Minnies' panties slipping out from under her dress.

Does anybody else think it's a little funny that Minnies panties are always slipping out from under her dress?

Midzy · Post by **Midzy** » Sun 16th May 2010 08:37 am

No I dont find it funny I find it very sexy, she is giving out a sublimable message that says "come and get it boys I am a funky sex machine"

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 16th May 2010 09:27 am

Yeah, she's one sexy rodent.

DC · Post by DC » Wed 14th Jul 2010 08:35 pm

Seeing how you've came out of the woodwork....Got some good stuff for ya regarding this, If you'll just stop thinking about Walt Disney's cock and Minnie Mouse's panties (bloomers actually) for a second. I'll give ya some clues and you can fry yer head with the rest...

Mickey Mouse watch, released in 1933.
On Oct 3 1955 the Mickey Mouse club starts, new watch released with the words Mickey Mouse Club written on it. MMClub..ClubMM..MM=.....10/03/1955...10/03/1+9/5+5...10+03+10+10=
Typical picture of a watch..

10:10. (1/3 of the clock face 33%?) It doesn't take much to stretch a connection to 9:11 should ya want to take that route, but I advise clock faces and protractors, see if ya can't rustle yerself up a couple of nice pyramids made with some interesting angles. Have fun.

Mindraker · Post by **Mindraker** » Wed 14th Jul 2010 09:59 pm

Drugs and Dan Brown don't go well together... I wouldn't combo that atleast.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Wed 14th Jul 2010 10:11 pm

Excellent theory, but I think your calculations are incorrect. I think the correct equation looks something like this.

DC = someone who thinks he's funny + someone who tries way too hard to be funny + someone who's jokes are completely lame

DC · Post by DC » Wed 14th Jul 2010 10:25 pm

Awww...still huffin mate. I thought we'd got past that when ya came out to play again. You'd like to think it was a joke seeing how it has more conspiracy bollox connectin than any of the crap you post, and unlike that crap. I'm the origional source. FFS crack a smile would ya, I'll even pay for the stitches. I may make lame jokes, but you pal, are one.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Wed 14th Jul 2010 10:38 pm

Huffin? No, just pokin al little fun at ya.

DC · Post by DC » Wed 14th Jul 2010 10:55 pm

I can see now how you'd think my jokes were lame, yer hillarious dude....true comedy genius!.

Don't worry, it would bug the shit out of me too if some annoying unbeliever was coming up with better theories than the ones I'd started the thread with. I mean, no matter how good and interesting they actually seemed...how could ya fully enjoy researching them with that annoying image running through yer mind all the time.

[

sam · Post by **sam** » Thu 15th Jul 2010 09:58 pm

Stanky Danky wrote:
Ingwey Gooblebogger wrote:A
"33rd degree mason"
?

What the hell is that?

Second, so a mason that is "32 or less degrees" or "34 or more degrees" is okay but the dreaded 33rd degree masons are the dangerous ones?

Also, for all their "nefarious plots", uuuhhhmm, why would adding subliminal porn to "family entertainment" be high on their agenda?

I mean, if I were running a "secretive cult" with such great powers, I think I would focus on world domination and making lots of money.

The Masons are, simply, a fraternity, no more, no less.

In uni I went to many parties at frat houses and never did world domination come up at any of them. Although the "all the beer you can drink for $5.00" nights might have been a cleverly devised plot to implant these memes into our young booze-addled minds?
Hiding things in plain sight is just a fun little game the Masons like to play. Washington DC has loads of hidden symbols on many of it's buildings that the Masons built. And comparing the Masons to a college fraternity is completely laughable. Why would a harmless fraternity allow Aliester Crowley, the most famous satanist of all time, to become a 33rd degree Mason? I've done way too much research on the Masons to think they are simply just a fraternity.

Stanky Danky if you are into freemasons I might have a book for you. Many years ago I found this book it is small and black like all secret books should be. On page 8 it gives the title as "The founders of masonic law the landmarks or the unwritten law" by albert g mackey some of the book is in english most in in some code. There is no print date in the book but is is really old.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Fri 16th Jul 2010 02:54 am

Thanks, I'm always interested in digging a little deeper to see what new dirt I can find. I'll Google that title and author to see what I can come up with.