Marijuana for Kids!

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 04:27 pm

Getting into a debate with you is completely ridiculous. You constantly twist everything I post and make me out to look like I'm siding with the extremes of an opinion. I said in my first reply the father was unqualified to diagnose his son as mentally ill that's why I think he's bullshit. No I don't know if this father is anti-marijuana, but that is completely beside the point. I never said anything about him being anti-marijuana. Just another example of you arguing against a point nobody made just to make it look like your winning the debate.

Sir Niall of Essex-sire · Sat 31st Jul 2010 05:12 pm

Stanky Danky wrote:Getting into a debate with you is completely ridiculous. You constantly twist everything I post and make me out to look like I'm siding with the extremes of an opinion. I said in my first reply the father was unqualified to diagnose his son as mentally ill that's why I think he's bullshit. No I don't know if this father is anti-marijuana, but that is completely beside the point. I never said anything about him being anti-marijuana. Just another example of you arguing against a point nobody made just to make it look like your winning the debate.

Right, so if the father isn't qualified to make the decision, why do you accept the decision of the mother?

What exactly is the difference?

Instead of crying and side-stepping the question, actually answer it. Because it's ridiculous the way you avoid the question.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 05:35 pm

Did you even read my first reply? Never once did I avoid the question.

Simple, it's very easy to tell if someones behavior has improved, especially if your the mother of that someone and know your childs behavior well. As opposed to someone unqualified to diagnose a mental illness like this kid's father.

Sir Niall of Essex-sire · Sat 31st Jul 2010 05:43 pm

Stanky Danky wrote:Did you even read my first reply? Never once did I avoid the question.

Simple, it's very easy to tell if someones behavior has improved, especially if your the mother of that someone and know your childs behavior well. As opposed to someone unqualified to diagnose a mental illness like this kid's father.

Yes i did, but this is fucking ridiculous;

so it's possible to tell someones getting better and attribute that to one single factor, but it's impossible to tell if someones getting worse and be able to attribute that to a single factor?

C'mon man, even you've gotta be able to see that's bullshit.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:30 pm

Well, he got happy and started eating alot. Something tells me the weed is working.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 07:16 pm

the problem with the debate is that neighter one of you is debating,

You guys are slinging monkey shit.... each trying to catch the other in a mis-speak.....so you can go SEE.....

TRY AND GET THIS BACK ON TRACK.......

Sir Niall of Essex-sire · Sat 31st Jul 2010 08:59 pm

Stanky Danky wrote:Well, he got happy and started eating alot. Something tells me the weed is working.

Right, and the other kid became socially withdrawn, started hearing voices and super paranoid at everything. Would that not be just as easy to see that somethings wrong?

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 11:35 pm

So the kid's a head case and can't handle a little mary jane in his system. Sorry no sympathy for a weak little retard.

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Sat 31st Jul 2010 11:59 pm

y you gatta beat up the poor kid

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 1st Aug 2010 01:28 am

Why you gotta act like your sympathetic all of a sudden? You spend all day going off on a naked rampage on every other thread and now your suddenly acting like you feel sorry for the kid. What I want to know is where were all these schizo headcases before they were brainwashed by the media that they were suddenly prone to a mental illness? I never heard of a single case of any kids getting messed up like this on marijuana growing up. Now after some bitch with an agenda puts out a biased ass study trying to connect mental illness with marijuana there's a sudden flood of them. I smell some seriously brainwashed retards.

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 1st Aug 2010 02:19 am

And another thing I think is pretty funny is all these headcases that I see popping up are all in the UK, where the media is constantly assaulting their heads with this nonsense. I never hear of these cases popping up in America. I'm almost completely convinced the media has alot of people in the UK convinced that if they smoke the dreaded Skunk they might lose their minds.

Sir Niall of Essex-sire · Sun 1st Aug 2010 06:43 am

Stanky Danky wrote:So the kid's a head case and can't handle a little mary jane in his system. Sorry no sympathy for a weak little retard.

Oh the compassion of the MMJ activist...

And another thing I think is pretty funny is all these headcases that I see popping up are all in the UK, where the media is constantly assaulting their heads with this nonsense. I never hear of these cases popping up in America. I'm almost completely convinced the media has alot of people in the UK convinced that if they smoke the dreaded Skunk they might lose their minds.

You're missing the point, i'm not saying the claims are legitimate or not. I'm asking you

Right, so if the father isn't qualified to make the decision, why do you accept the decision of the mother?

What exactly is the difference?

Any chance of an answer?

Stanky Danky · Post by **Stanky Danky** » Sun 1st Aug 2010 01:33 pm

The little joke I made about the kid not being able to handle a little mary jane was just that a joke and had nothing to do with MMJ activisim. Just another attempt to twist something I post and connect it to an extreme of an opinion you oppose. In your second point you tell me you're not saying the claims are legitimate or not. If you post the story you're obviously saying the fathers claim is legitimate, and in your third point you are asking why the fathers claim is not legitimate.

And for that question you keep asking, I'll re-phrase my response since my original response somehow doesn't qualify as an answer. First off the father and mother aren't making decisions they're giving opinions. The fathers opinion of his son's mental health status is an uneducated opinion since he's not qualified medically to give such an opinion. The mothers opinion about her sons behavior improving on the other hand does not require a masters degree to be legitimate. She is simply observing an improvement in her sons behavior.

gixxer · Post by **gixxer** » Sun 1st Aug 2010 02:29 pm

Stanky Danky wrote:So the kid's a head case and can't handle a little mary jane in his system. Sorry no sympathy for a weak little retard.

a fuckin sick joke

bluelaru · Post by **bluelaru** » Sun 1st Aug 2010 05:15 pm

[quote="Stanky Danky"]Why you gotta act like your sympathetic all of a sudden? You spend all day going off on a naked rampage

How did you know... I was NAKED

You have been doing a good job....playing in the sandbox with Naill

But when you called the kid...a retard....

YELLOW CARD

other then that carrie on

I think parents make kids crazy... then throw in all the chemical's mainlined thru food and drink, flooring , and furniture..... WATER

But I also wonder if a pro cannibus study would and will tell the truth.

I dont know any of the answers, but in a perfect world... I could only hope
a plant everyone could grow themselves would be the answer...

but like someone put it in another thread....that would cost a lot of jobs