Marijuana Compound Halts Breast Cancer Tumor Growth

[Stanky Danky]

Possible threat of stabbing etc.

Just to clear up any confusion, I never threatened to stab anyone. DC posted a quote from someone else in an attempt to make me look bad.

[islandgurl]

they may be the reason the people believed MJ had to be made illegal, but the real interests can be found in the economy, suchs as oil,cotton etc....

Yeah but if they would have exposed their ulterior motives, people would have seen them for the greedy, power-hungry bastards they were and no support would have been given by the public. Better in those times to be known as a racist.... sad, but true. DuPont and Hearst got richer, Anslinger got the power he craved. Achieved their goal and didn't care how they did it... or who got hurt in the process.

Anybody got a time machine I can borrow for a little while? This southern girl could whoop some 'ayuss'!

tell me when your date of time-travel is, I will make sure to have a big bat with me.....or wait, we just have to make some brownies and give it to them before they make their speeches

LMAO I like the way you think, shady! Double hash brownies coming up...

[Sir Niall of Essex-sire]

You have no idea how funny it is to watch you try so hard to look smart only to look like a complete moron. I'll respond to each of your points just so you don't cry about how I have no answers.

Irony doesn't just get the winkles out of your clothes.

Nice fancy wording, too bad the point your making is completely retarded. Questioning the science of a scientist loses all effecitveness when you know nothing about the science that was involved in the study. It's a bit like me commenting on the complexity of Beethoven's symphonies when I know nothing about writing music myself. And comparing the knowledge necessary to change the chain on your bike to the knowledge necessary to conduct a scientific study is utterly laughable.

Wrong, Scientists have to apply their results, this requires logic, logic can be questioned. So if Beethoven farted and claimed it as the greasted musical piece in the world you'd accept it as such? Or course not, because you can have an insight into arts and science dispite lacking qualification in the subject. Also, intelligence shouldn't be measured in terms of academic awards. Retard.

It's an applied example of your logic, it's your logic that makes it laughable, retard.

Now, my point is that being qualified in a disicipline does not have a implication on the effectiveness on one to comment/act on the situation. Traditional qualifications are the be all and measure of total aquire knowledge of a human being.

Nope never said that. I said your opinion of the results of a study are uneducated because you don't have the scientific knowledge to give such an opinion. Just another attempt by Niall to twist my words to strengthen his case.

Talking bollocks, again. I have not commended on the methodology at all, i have commented on the implications and interpretations of the studies by others. All of which is logic based.

How can you question the science of a scientific study when you have no knowledge of the science involved in the study? I guess you either trust the science of the scientist or you don't.

So you're a sheep at the will of propaganda machine because you're in awe of a white coat or not.

Again i haven't commented on methodology.

I guess you could say the same thing about your belief in the case for schizophrenia and marijuana. I think you would look the bigger sheep though considering there was no real science involved in that study.

There's more than one study backing up that susposed link.

I've already said i disagree with that study, i also treat that study with the same critical thinking as i do with yours. You just don't apply a critical mind to things that you think back up your own viewpoints.

Sure there are philosophers who have commented on science, but that has nothing to do with the science used during a scientific study. The scientist uses no philosophy when tracking the progress of a tumor just science. Another swing and a miss by Sir Niall.

Yes it does, Science is simply the aqquiring of emperical evidence, the interpretation of that is logical. Logic is Philosophical. Simple enough?

Having an opinion on someones philosophy is much different than having an opinion on a scientific method you're not educated on. As a scientifically uneducated person you can either trust the science of the scientist or question it even though you know nothing about his scientific method. Questioning someones philosophy is really only questioning their opinion not the results they got using science. You certainly do enjoy trying to relate two totally different subjects don't you.

No, wrong, completely fucking wrong. Philosophy isn't just an opinion, an opinion doesn't have to be justified. Philosophy is the examination of the thought process's that run before the opinion being formed. Philosophy and Science are related, of course they are, the basic question of the nature of Emprical Evidence, which is at the basis of Sciencitific aims, is Philosophical. They are linked, you provide no evidence otherwise except saying they're not. Read Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, read the work of Bentham and you will see explicit ( esp. in the final work ) references to science.

You clearly have no idea about Philosphy.

BULLSHIT. I answered all the questions you were crying about being unanswered. Your shit is weak and I'm easily capable of responding.

You do a good job of hiding it man.