No 10 tram closest stop to dam square
No 10 tram closest stop to dam square
want to go to chapiteau, the no 10 tram goes to De Wittenkade nearest stop, but i have to go all the way to mellow yellow to catch the tram so is there an alternative route?? or is there a stop closer to to dam square where i can get the no 10 tram from.. many thanks
Re: No 10 tram closest stop to dam square
Nope, it does not run up there but goes east-west. You can pick it up at the Leidseplein.stuart1976 wrote:want to go to chapiteau, the no 10 tram goes to De Wittenkade nearest stop, but i have to go all the way to mellow yellow to catch the tram so is there an alternative route?? or is there a stop closer to to dam square where i can get the no 10 tram from.. many thanks
Sorry, I did not understand your question.joeuk wrote:is it walkin distance from there thou or is tram the best optionMarco wrote:The 10 stops right there.joeuk wrote:how far from the leidesplein is it marco
Anyone coming to Chapiteau, send me a PM. We can meet up if I am available. I know a few pubs nearby we can smoke in as its a buy/fly shop.
Nope, its a good 10 minutes on the tram, not walkable really.
If you go take a bus to haarlemmerplein, when you cross the bridge (lots of traffic lights) take a left on the Wittenstraat, its a nice street. There are some interesting (more modern) buildings around there and old ones as well.stuart1976 wrote:thanks for the link Balou.. it says i can get the citybus line 21 from Cs Centrum / Pr Hendrikkade to Haarlemmerplein
on the other hand im off my face and could be totally wrong
I just google street viewed it (I appreciate it doesn't compare to the real thing) and I hated it, I really dont care for modern Amsterdam, personally I'd rather walk down the next road (De Wittenkade) along the canal.Marco wrote:If you go take a bus to haarlemmerplein, when you cross the bridge (lots of traffic lights) take a left on the Wittenstraat, its a nice street. There are some interesting (more modern) buildings around there and old ones as well.
Being pedantic and knobbish since 1972
I may have meant the Wittenkade actually, but really there are a few very interesting more modern areas in those two blocksBoner wrote:I just google street viewed it (I appreciate it doesn't compare to the real thing) and I hated it, I really dont care for modern Amsterdam, personally I'd rather walk down the next road (De Wittenkade) along the canal.Marco wrote:If you go take a bus to haarlemmerplein, when you cross the bridge (lots of traffic lights) take a left on the Wittenstraat, its a nice street. There are some interesting (more modern) buildings around there and old ones as well.
I used to feel the way you did, but have gained an immense appreciation for Amsterdam's varied architecture, especially some of the social wonen estates.
A new museum dedicated to Amsterdam's city planner of the 50s-70s just opened.
http://www.vaneesterenmuseum.nl/index.php?id=15
Openingstijden
Welkom in het Van Eesterenmuseum.
Het Van Eesterenmuseum vertelt het verhaal van stedenbouwkundige Cornelis van Eesteren en zijn wereldberoemde Westelijke Tuinsteden.
Wij zijn geopend op vrijdag en zaterdag van 11:00 tot 17:00 uur
Entree
Toegang museum en architectuurwandeling, incl. koffie/thee € 5,-
Adres
Van Eesterenmuseum
Burgemeester De Vlugtlaan 125
1063 BJ Amsterdam
Bekijk het museum hier op Google Maps.
Contact
Email: info@vaneesterenmuseum.nl
Telefoon: 020 – 447 – 1857
Bezoek het Van Eesterenmuseum ook op: Twitter en Facebook.
Route/bereikbaarheid

- Pauli Wallnuts
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sat 28th Mar 2009 04:19 pm
- Location: South London
agree 100%, i love old architecture, have used ajax arena car park a few times, & as soon as your out of metro tunnel (centrum) it is UGLY, just travelling through block upon block of cheaply built flats layed out in a grid, old architecture is what makes amsterdam so nice, im sure thats why rotterdam is nowhere near as popular as it could be being nederlands 2nd city, similar to coventry, i bet if it hadnt been destroyed in ww2 it would attract more visitors, instead they go to places like oxfordBoner wrote:I really dont care for modern Amsterdam, personally I'd rather walk down the next road (De Wittenkade) along the canal.
Really?? How can you not find the Amsterdam School (1920s) architecture compelling to look at?Pauli Wallnuts wrote:agree 100%, i love old architecture, have used ajax arena car park a few times, & as soon as your out of metro tunnel (centrum) it is UGLY, just travelling through block upon block of cheaply built flats layed out in a grid, old architecture is what makes amsterdam so nice, im sure thats why rotterdam is nowhere near as popular as it could be being nederlands 2nd city, similar to coventry, i bet if it hadnt been destroyed in ww2 it would attract more visitors, instead they go to places like oxfordBoner wrote:I really dont care for modern Amsterdam, personally I'd rather walk down the next road (De Wittenkade) along the canal.


I think there are some amazing buildings of that type, many outside of the center.
As for the 60-80s stuff, I agree its not quaint or pretty. But in the context of the times, and in the context of the goals of the buildings (living spaces, communities, not just flats) I like it. Compare it to the same architecture in other European cities of that time and it does not look so bad.
In the end, they cannot build old-style houses in modern times.
- Pauli Wallnuts
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sat 28th Mar 2009 04:19 pm
- Location: South London
id written a detailed reply marco, but when i hit submit it said critical error & deleted
long story short, thats a lovely building, modern architecture imo started in 1940's since then its all about building as cheap/quick as possible, which means not using bricks because some1 has to be paid to lay them,
imo breeze blocks & plasterboard are the evils of architectue & i would never buy a property built after 1930's (in london anyway),
my other reply was much better using the woolworth building in manhattan, & gherkin in london as examples, but i cant be arsed to re write
long story short, thats a lovely building, modern architecture imo started in 1940's since then its all about building as cheap/quick as possible, which means not using bricks because some1 has to be paid to lay them,
imo breeze blocks & plasterboard are the evils of architectue & i would never buy a property built after 1930's (in london anyway),
my other reply was much better using the woolworth building in manhattan, & gherkin in london as examples, but i cant be arsed to re write
