merry xmas to our troops
Moderator: Balou
- king solomon
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Tue 18th May 2010 11:27 pm
- Location: east london
this is just getting silly now............
both gixxer and cisco have come at me without explaining what i have actually done wrong, infact im starting to look at it as some kind of veiled "internet" bullying
you know what im guessing you are both gonna be in dam for 420 as i am too. maybe we should just carry this conversation on face to face, something tells me you wont be so insulting when its not just words on the internet
both gixxer and cisco have come at me without explaining what i have actually done wrong, infact im starting to look at it as some kind of veiled "internet" bullying
you know what im guessing you are both gonna be in dam for 420 as i am too. maybe we should just carry this conversation on face to face, something tells me you wont be so insulting when its not just words on the internet
weed=illegal alcohol=legal why?
- king solomon
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Tue 18th May 2010 11:27 pm
- Location: east london
nothing to do with growing a pair of balls, i apologized for saying what i said even though it was just a reaction to being insulted and you still chose to carry on without giving me an explanation why. and maybe i will end up in a "dutch icu" we will see that when the time comes.gixxer wrote:i wasnt gonna go to 420,,,,i just might now
you can let us all know what a dutch ICU looks like
and as for bullying,, grow up and grow a pair of balls
weed=illegal alcohol=legal why?
Not a problem mate yeah i will be at 420 is that a threat anyone that knows me knows i wouldntt say behind your back/on the net etc that i would not say to your face !! that aint how i roll see ya Aprilking solomon wrote:this is just getting silly now............
both gixxer and cisco have come at me without explaining what i have actually done wrong, infact im starting to look at it as some kind of veiled "internet" bullying
you know what im guessing you are both gonna be in dam for 420 as i am too. maybe we should just carry this conversation on face to face, something tells me you wont be so insulting when its not just words on the internet
Last edited by Cisco on Wed 29th Dec 2010 10:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
And its not that you done "anything wrong" but really is the above statement really called for on this thread ? you could have started a new thread with your opinion ? after all your entitled to itking solomon wrote:melb-dam-lover wrote:I listen to all of these NBA players and coaches, all on millions of dollars a year and absolute superstars, complaining about having to "work" on Christmas Day. Well, they should stop and think about those serving overseas, who have to spend the day in a foreign and dangerous land, all to ensure you have an OPPORTUNITY to work and play on Christmas Day at all.
sorry mate, but neither do the people in the army "have" to work on xmas day, they choose to be there the same way i chose not to join the army, i really dont understand all this special praise the people in the army get for doing a job they wanted to do and get paid for. dont get me wrong i respect them for their choice and definatly have praise for those who served in ww2 (because in them days you didnt have a choice about joining the army or not) but i just dont get this "love in" for "our" troops.
-
- king solomon
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Tue 18th May 2010 11:27 pm
- Location: east london
cisco wrote:And its not that you done "anything wrong" but really is the above statement really called for on this thread ? you could have started a new thread with your opinion ? after all your entitled to itking solomon wrote:melb-dam-lover wrote:I listen to all of these NBA players and coaches, all on millions of dollars a year and absolute superstars, complaining about having to "work" on Christmas Day. Well, they should stop and think about those serving overseas, who have to spend the day in a foreign and dangerous land, all to ensure you have an OPPORTUNITY to work and play on Christmas Day at all.
sorry mate, but neither do the people in the army "have" to work on xmas day, they choose to be there the same way i chose not to join the army, i really dont understand all this special praise the people in the army get for doing a job they wanted to do and get paid for. dont get me wrong i respect them for their choice and definatly have praise for those who served in ww2 (because in them days you didnt have a choice about joining the army or not) but i just dont get this "love in" for "our" troops.
I have just read over that same statement about 10 times to see the bit where i may of offended somebody and still cant find it, was it the bit where I said that they didnt have to work on xmas day, it was a choice they made when they signed up?, or the bit where I said I definatly have respect for the veterans of ww2? or maybe you didnt like the inverted comma's round the "our troops" bit, am I not entitled to be a bit sarcastic when talking about the british army (seeing as I was born and raised in England). I was refering to tabloids like the sun newspaper who always love to call them our troops/boys. but I dont personally look at them as my troops i just look at them as people doing a job what they want to do. and the reason why i asked this question in this thread is because i thought about it while reading it. i really dont feel that strongly about the subject to start a new thread so yes i do feel this was the right place to ask the question I thought thats what forums were for ( or is this just the must have the same opinion as cisco forum? ) . All somebody had to do was reply to me the way artymac did in his 3rd post and that would have been end of discussion, simple. Maybe if I had started spouting hatred or was being derogatory about them i would understand the shit I have been hearing but i wasnt. so thats why it piss's me off when people think they can call me names and get away with it like im some kind of prick who lets people talk to him like that because trust me im not.
weed=illegal alcohol=legal why?
king solomon wrote:cisco wrote:And its not that you done "anything wrong" but really is the above statement really called for on this thread ? you could have started a new thread with your opinion ? after all your entitled to itking solomon wrote:
sorry mate, but neither do the people in the army "have" to work on xmas day, they choose to be there the same way i chose not to join the army, i really dont understand all this special praise the people in the army get for doing a job they wanted to do and get paid for. dont get me wrong i respect them for their choice and definatly have praise for those who served in ww2 (because in them days you didnt have a choice about joining the army or not) but i just dont get this "love in" for "our" troops.
I have just read over that same statement about 10 times to see the bit where i may of offended somebody and still cant find it, was it the bit where I said that they didnt have to work on xmas day, it was a choice they made when they signed up?, or the bit where I said I definatly have respect for the veterans of ww2? or maybe you didnt like the inverted comma's round the "our troops" bit, am I not entitled to be a bit sarcastic when talking about the british army (seeing as I was born and raised in England). I was refering to tabloids like the sun newspaper who always love to call them our troops/boys. but I dont personally look at them as my troops i just look at them as people doing a job what they want to do. and the reason why i asked this question in this thread is because i thought about it while reading it. i really dont feel that strongly about the subject to start a new thread so yes i do feel this was the right place to ask the question I thought thats what forums were for ( or is this just the must have the same opinion as cisco forum? ) . All somebody had to do was reply to me the way artymac did in his 3rd post and that would have been end of discussion, simple. Maybe if I had started spouting hatred or was being derogatory about them i would understand the shit I have been hearing but i wasnt. so thats why it piss's me off when people think they can call me names and get away with it like im some kind of prick who lets people talk to him like that because trust me im not.
Dude, let it go and STFU! Coming from someone as widely hated on various message boards as I am, quit when you are ahead. You were sarcastic towards a post respecting soldiers. Some of us, even those who hate the wars the US, UK etc are fighting, will not back down in support of the poor kids who do the killing and dying in OUR NAME (yes, if you are a citizen, its done in your name).
You are coming off as a crybaby. My $.02
- king solomon
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Tue 18th May 2010 11:27 pm
- Location: east london
Marco wrote:king solomon wrote:cisco wrote: And its not that you done "anything wrong" but really is the above statement really called for on this thread ? you could have started a new thread with your opinion ? after all your entitled to it
I have just read over that same statement about 10 times to see the bit where i may of offended somebody and still cant find it, was it the bit where I said that they didnt have to work on xmas day, it was a choice they made when they signed up?, or the bit where I said I definatly have respect for the veterans of ww2? or maybe you didnt like the inverted comma's round the "our troops" bit, am I not entitled to be a bit sarcastic when talking about the british army (seeing as I was born and raised in England). I was refering to tabloids like the sun newspaper who always love to call them our troops/boys. but I dont personally look at them as my troops i just look at them as people doing a job what they want to do. and the reason why i asked this question in this thread is because i thought about it while reading it. i really dont feel that strongly about the subject to start a new thread so yes i do feel this was the right place to ask the question I thought thats what forums were for ( or is this just the must have the same opinion as cisco forum? ) . All somebody had to do was reply to me the way artymac did in his 3rd post and that would have been end of discussion, simple. Maybe if I had started spouting hatred or was being derogatory about them i would understand the shit I have been hearing but i wasnt. so thats why it piss's me off when people think they can call me names and get away with it like im some kind of prick who lets people talk to him like that because trust me im not.
Dude, let it go and STFU! Coming from someone as widely hated on various message boards as I am, quit when you are ahead. You were sarcastic towards a post respecting soldiers. Some of us, even those who hate the wars the US, UK etc are fighting, will not back down in support of the poor kids who do the killing and dying in OUR NAME (yes, if you are a citizen, its done in your name).
You are coming off as a crybaby. My $.02
weed=illegal alcohol=legal why?
Just the response I expected son. Go to bed, you wouldn't want Mom to be cross at you tomorrow.king solomon wrote:Marco wrote:king solomon wrote:
I have just read over that same statement about 10 times to see the bit where i may of offended somebody and still cant find it, was it the bit where I said that they didnt have to work on xmas day, it was a choice they made when they signed up?, or the bit where I said I definatly have respect for the veterans of ww2? or maybe you didnt like the inverted comma's round the "our troops" bit, am I not entitled to be a bit sarcastic when talking about the british army (seeing as I was born and raised in England). I was refering to tabloids like the sun newspaper who always love to call them our troops/boys. but I dont personally look at them as my troops i just look at them as people doing a job what they want to do. and the reason why i asked this question in this thread is because i thought about it while reading it. i really dont feel that strongly about the subject to start a new thread so yes i do feel this was the right place to ask the question I thought thats what forums were for ( or is this just the must have the same opinion as cisco forum? ) . All somebody had to do was reply to me the way artymac did in his 3rd post and that would have been end of discussion, simple. Maybe if I had started spouting hatred or was being derogatory about them i would understand the shit I have been hearing but i wasnt. so thats why it piss's me off when people think they can call me names and get away with it like im some kind of prick who lets people talk to him like that because trust me im not.
Dude, let it go and STFU! Coming from someone as widely hated on various message boards as I am, quit when you are ahead. You were sarcastic towards a post respecting soldiers. Some of us, even those who hate the wars the US, UK etc are fighting, will not back down in support of the poor kids who do the killing and dying in OUR NAME (yes, if you are a citizen, its done in your name).
You are coming off as a crybaby. My $.02
Hey man im jus saying why i responded the way i did im not trying to antagonise you or owt and yeah its all agree wi Cisco did you not read that bit when you signed up ?king solomon wrote:cisco wrote:And its not that you done "anything wrong" but really is the above statement really called for on this thread ? you could have started a new thread with your opinion ? after all your entitled to itking solomon wrote:
sorry mate, but neither do the people in the army "have" to work on xmas day, they choose to be there the same way i chose not to join the army, i really dont understand all this special praise the people in the army get for doing a job they wanted to do and get paid for. dont get me wrong i respect them for their choice and definatly have praise for those who served in ww2 (because in them days you didnt have a choice about joining the army or not) but i just dont get this "love in" for "our" troops.
I have just read over that same statement about 10 times to see the bit where i may of offended somebody and still cant find it, was it the bit where I said that they didnt have to work on xmas day, it was a choice they made when they signed up?, or the bit where I said I definatly have respect for the veterans of ww2? or maybe you didnt like the inverted comma's round the "our troops" bit, am I not entitled to be a bit sarcastic when talking about the british army (seeing as I was born and raised in England). I was refering to tabloids like the sun newspaper who always love to call them our troops/boys. but I dont personally look at them as my troops i just look at them as people doing a job what they want to do. and the reason why i asked this question in this thread is because i thought about it while reading it. i really dont feel that strongly about the subject to start a new thread so yes i do feel this was the right place to ask the question I thought thats what forums were for ( or is this just the must have the same opinion as cisco forum? ) . All somebody had to do was reply to me the way artymac did in his 3rd post and that would have been end of discussion, simple. Maybe if I had started spouting hatred or was being derogatory about them i would understand the shit I have been hearing but i wasnt. so thats why it piss's me off when people think they can call me names and get away with it like im some kind of prick who lets people talk to him like that because trust me im not.
-