Page 6 of 10

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 05:32 pm
by 25211
Mr_Gav wrote:
Twichaldinho wrote:
Mr_Gav wrote:...I should have known it was a waste of time trying to debate with a fucking lefty, they're all the same: violent, theiving, stupid, ignorant cunts.

I suggest you go and sit in the corner for a while big fella.... I do believe any point you tried to make, has just been voided......
I'm angry, he's saying that it's okay that I'm robbed on a daily basis by the state and even dared to suggest I am some kind of lowlife for not handing over the money with a smile. Sorry if I offended anyone other than those I intended to offend.
Oh my heart bleed for you NOT!
No one likes paying taxes, but it is a fact of life, I am not keen on the idea myself
But you seem to be having difficulty getting your point across without being downright offensive
And deliberately trying to offend people is usually a mistake or last resort of the wrong

You state that you resent the state, so you are an anarchist then?

& at no point did I call you "low life scum" I called the rioters that
so don't get offensive with me just because of the way you choose to twist my words

Oh & what are you smoking cos I want an OZ as it must be bloody good

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 05:37 pm
by Twichaldinho
Mr_Gav wrote: I'm angry, he's saying that it's okay that I'm robbed on a daily basis by the state and even dared to suggest I am some kind of lowlife for not handing over the money with a smile. Sorry if I offended anyone other than those I intended to offend.
Thats not really the case though is it. You seem to be reading what you want into his post....... I just hope you never require the police...or the fire service.....or even a prescription for super strength pain killers for the chip on yer shoulder...... Our tax revenue goes towards so much more than the single mum with 5 bairns, that you percieve as a scrounger.....
Besides, if yer angry, yi dont need to swear......swearing should be fun,,,, :mrgreen:

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 05:51 pm
by spireax
Twichaldinho wrote: Besides, if yer angry, yi dont need to swear......swearing should be fun,,,, :mrgreen:
ain't that the truth :lol:

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 06:08 pm
by Mr_Gav
@25211 Assuming I'm either BNP or EDL just shows how completely uneducated you are. Everything is black & white to you (or right & left). I'd bet every penny I have that you don't even understand the difference or are even aware of the other ends of the political spectrum.

You didn't call me 'lowlife scum', I never said you did. You said, "It is people with the attitude of I won’t use/don’t need X service or Y resource so why should I pay for it who are 100% to blame And that is not a million miles away from the attitude of I haven’t got a big TV or the latest phone so let’s just go nick one", which is suggesting I'm some kind of lowlife, that's what I said.

Anarchist is an accurate description of my position but, I don't like to use the term because the vast majority don't understand what it actually means, including you no doubt.


@Twichaldinho Are you suggesting I shouldn't use the police or fire service or NHS or whatever, just because I think it's wrong that I'm forced to pay for them? That's what it sounds like.

I don't think mums with 5 kids living off the state are scroungers at all, they are simply being economically smart. Having a load of kids is a way out of poverty without even working for it, why the hell wouldn't they? They'd need to be in a pretty well payed job to afford the large homes and luxuries they have given to them for free by the state.

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 06:43 pm
by 25211
Mr_Gav wrote:@25211 Assuming I'm either BNP or EDL just shows how completely uneducated you are. Everything is black & white to you (or right & left). I'd bet every penny I have that you don't even understand the difference or are even aware of the other ends of the political spectrum.
Sorry if that offends you but based on your aggressive posting style and resort to being offensive it was an easy mistake to make
I am fully aware of the wide range of the political spectrum, global politics, political history is an intrest of mine
(secret vice)

so please don't question my education
Mr_Gav wrote:You didn't call me 'lowlife scum', I never said you did. You said, "It is people with the attitude of I won’t use/don’t need X service or Y resource so why should I pay for it who are 100% to blame And that is not a million miles away from the attitude of I haven’t got a big TV or the latest phone so let’s just go nick one", which is suggesting I'm some kind of lowlife, that's what I said.
Sorry again but that is how you have chosen to interpret what I have said
all I was trying to say was I can see very little difference between the two scenarios
& "Lowlife" was your own choice of words
Mr_Gav wrote:Anarchist is an accurate description of my position but, I don't like to use the term because the vast majority don't understand what it actually means, including you no doubt.
I am aware of what the term anarchist means, at times I have called some friends
As I have said I have an interest in politics and discussing and debating with someone with different point of view is something I enjoy

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 07:01 pm
by spidergawd
Image

And we're really pissed off, we've got top seat tickets for the England/Holland friendly at Wembley thats cancelled :cry:.

Oh yeah, the worst brings out the best.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14475741

Rock on :D.

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 07:04 pm
by Mr_Gav
25211 wrote:Sorry again but that is how you have chosen to interpret what I have said
all I was trying to say was I can see very little difference between the two scenarios
& "Lowlife" was your own choice of words
You're just being pedantic, it's pointless. I can see what you were suggesting and anyone else with half a brain will see too.

I find it offensive that you think it's okay that my money is stolen from me, but I can live with that. What I can't tolerate is how you suggest I'm a bad person for opposing the theft and now you're acting like I'm being unreasonable for being angry about it.

All I want is to live my life free from coercion. I don't discriminate either, I want every man, woman and child on the planet to also live their lives free from coercion. What the hell is wrong with that?

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 07:11 pm
by Rusty Shackleford
No matter what country you go to, whatever political and social systems there are, there will always be people at the top.....

I just couldn't see a Revolution starting by raiding Poundland :lol:

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 07:28 pm
by artymac
"bigs" you are absolutely right my speciality is not the mentality of "London" street gangs! But is the mentality of any city, large town street gang any different wherever you go? Gangs believe they own the area they live in and it is their right to rule the roost and dispence 'punishments' and 'justice' as and when they desire, whilst they "farm" the community for their own needs, either in goods or money.
Yeah, i've seen some codes of behaviour passed down from generation to generation, in families and communities to differing degrees, where i live and further afield.
Reasons can be varied. Individual people still have the right to say how far they'll opt in or out.
Your first paragraph i still don't understand. "Buzz words", designed to impress and sometimes intimidate the listener into sitting quietly and nodding their heads. Or, in the case of speaking like this to a "London" street gang, to get your head kicked in, regardless of robbing you of anything they might want. Maybe i am too thick to understand, that's why i asked you to explain it. Thrill me with your acumen.
You may be living in the area and this indeed gives you a much greater insight into the problems that exist in your neighbourhood, but you have to be even handed about this. There are lots of good people getting by as best as they can, raising their families in places that don't have the same opportunities that other places have. It's the same all over "bigs".
You wrote "You seem to think that i am somehow trying influence children into beliving this stuff". So what does, "If you are born in a certain place and from a certain social demographic you're fucked", mean then?
"bigs" i think you posted because you see things where you live and you care. Top man, keep the debate going. But possibly because you've got some decent 'smoke' going 8) 8) , some of the things you're saying may not be coming out the way you meant, or is getting lost in translation. By fuck this this has happened often enough to me!!
I can see things in your post i agree with, but i've found it difficult to follow your arguement at times. I never said you were encouraging any of the stuff going on.... i said from your words that it sounded like you were "justifying these stupid actions".
Can we both rule out football and music as the people making it in these areas is negligible. So 99% of this group in your area are crimminals, or low paid workers and as many young people won't take that route, the biggest split is the crimminals. That's a bold, bold statement i'm sure a lot of the decent folk in the community would argue against.
"bigs" i'm a 46 year old, so depending on how old you are, young chap!, i might have seen more of them cycles of behaviour that have been going on for generations. People and places get trapped in poverty for many reasons and at different times. There are places in my home town that used to be the most sought after places to live and are now shit holes. In time they might change again, people have the ability to change as well. This doesn't mean it will be easy, peer pressure, consumer pressure, social norms, (buzz words!) that get taught and hammered into you from cradle to grave, will shape all of us to some degree.
But you only get one life. Are they going to take control of their own life, make decisions for themselves, take responsibility for themselves and their own children? Or, are they happy to go along with the crowd, happy with their lot as long as their needs are catered for, some benefit money to go along with whatever they can screw out of the people who live around them who can't offer up any resistance. Let TV raise their children. That's what i see from plenty of people living around me and it's getting worse. :( :(
In these circles what is the reaction to anyone who goes to school or gets a job? Seen and heard it so many times, "What a mug", "Traitor", "Think they're better than us". I remember a pal of mine telling me about a young guy who was on a training scheme with him who got ridiculed by some of the other guys on the course because he used to read a book a day.
Of course these guys could bearly read themselves because they "Fucked going to school".
"bigs" it ain't any different anywhere, it may just be on a different scale, or for different stakes.(High value crime families/syndicates.)
Ask any of the older generations in question if they believe the people out there looting have any justification for their actions, because they believe they are deprived through poverty.
I laughed and laughed when i read "this ain't the west of "Scotland", have you experienced social deprevation on the scale of somewhere like north peckham or mosside etc etc" In your own words, "do some research"
Yeah it's just like "Brigadoon" where i live, along with all the other quaint, quiet little fishing villages on the "Clyde" :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol:
Let me say first, there was a lot worse off than us, way worse, but i saw many a 'creative' meal set down in front of us, wore hand me downs it seemed most of my school life. (I remember a bright yellow polo neck jumper that could be seen from a mile away, no hiding place, that got me called 'custard' for a few weeks, before it 'mysteriously' got irrepairably damaged :idea: ) Lino on the bedroom floors, damp walls, ice on the inside of the windows in the bedroom an inch thick, i'll bet this is stirring the memories of many 'older' and not so old ACDers on the forum, yes it still exists, but it's not as bad. We didn't go looting though.
I've seen it where over the course of the weekend in the area where i live, that 2 people got stabbed to death and another 3 or 4 were seriously injured. It made it into the "Scottish" press and on to the "Scottish" news, no more.
A youth gets stabbed in a suburb of London and it's the first story on news at ten and questions are being asked in Parliament.
Now that's a demographic for you.
You're right "bigs", i did give alternatives but i wasn't preaching, i was just responding and i asked a few questions.
At the end of the day people will decide if they are going to go out and loot or not. Yeah they'll give excuses, like the "Monty Python" sketch, .... society made me do it! O.K. then, lets arrest society....!
But i for one ain't buying it. They are only that 'hard' in their own area. If i go to "Peckham" there's a chance i'd get a beating or worse just because of my accent. Racism, pure and simple. How often is the race card played down in "Peckham"? It's a two way street.
Let's get the same people who'd give out the beating up in the West of "Scotland", or through with the 'salt and sauce' crewe on the East coast. Let's see them try it on up here. They would be lucky to take their 'baws hame in a crisp poke'. Try it in "Wales", fuck me!, loads of other places in "England". I wouldn't recommend "Northern Ireland" either, they'd never be heard of again.
Wonder how many of them vote?
Toke on "bigs", .... age might change you.....!! :shock: :lol: :lol: 8)

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 07:53 pm
by bigs
You have raised valid points but at the same time are patronising me, age might change me and all this shit, along with the fact that you presume a point that you don't agree with means the author is smoking too much. Stop chatting shit.

As arrogant as it sounds I know I am right. As much as I would like to debate this with you further it's not going to go anywhere, and I haven't got time to be mocked on the internet. good luck.

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 09:48 pm
by Rusty Shackleford
I wouldn't recommend "Northern Ireland" either, they'd never be heard of again.

I know what your saying arty lad, but it would be the opposite....housebreakers, pensioner muggers, i could go on but to be completely honest they would rather be caught by the police.

Tared n feathered :shock: then paraded in the community that they where robbing from, there not so hard after that.

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 09:58 pm
by artymac
"bigs" if i ever gave the impression i was being patronising, i am very sorry. That was never my intention.
There where things that i didn't agree with from your first post and i asked some questions. I was not having a go at you and i was not presuming anything, especially about you smoking to much!!
"bigs", give your views the same as everyone else. That's what the forum is all about, debate.
Mocking people is definately not my style.
All the best "bigs", i take it you're a lot younger than 46?!! Lucky *******!!

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Wed 10th Aug 2011 11:22 pm
by Space Boy
craig_ulsterman wrote:


Tared n feathered :shock: then paraded in the community that they where robbing from, there not so hard after that.
OT but thats what my great grandfather did to my great grandmother for seeing another man when he was away fighting on the Somme. True story!


Carry on........

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Thu 11th Aug 2011 08:27 am
by 25211
Mr_Gav wrote:You're just being pedantic, it's pointless. I can see what you were suggesting and anyone else with half a brain will see too.
No I wasn’t being pedantic I was being accurate, you have chosen to read what you want in to that statement
Mr_Gav wrote:I find it offensive that you think it's okay that my money is stolen from me, but I can live with that. What I can't tolerate is how you suggest I'm a bad person for opposing the theft and now you're acting like I'm being unreasonable for being angry about it.

All I want is to live my life free from coercion. I don't discriminate either, I want every man, woman and child on the planet to also live their lives free from coercion. What the hell is wrong with that?
And I do not see how money is being stolen from you, unless you mean taxes, you have not been very explicit about your views
Coercion?? Again can you explain your meaning preferably without resorting to exaggerated examples of men with guns shooting people
As I said earlier no one likes paying taxes but they are a fact of life, show me any place on earth where there is a system that doesn’t use taxation
Your posts directed at me seem to have been motivated by me pointing out that I have left wing views, I only stated that to show the difference between the common perception of the left and my view on the riots and the cause of them
And I completely refute your claim that the welfare state is responsible

From what you have posted so far all I can assume is you only want to pay for services you use, is this the case?
Your comment to Twichalinho seems to imply otherwise
Mr_Gav wrote:@Twichaldinho Are you suggesting I shouldn't use the police or fire service or NHS or whatever, just because I think it's wrong that I'm forced to pay for them? That's what it sounds like.
But your comments about theft and money being stolen from you seem to imply the opposite
How would you suggest funding the fire service, police or NHS? Or do you favour a system of payment at point of delivery
As for your comments about “debating with a lefty” I have seen very little that resembles debate but a lot of provocative argument from you

Re: London Riots 2011

Posted: Thu 11th Aug 2011 02:41 pm
by Mr_Gav
@ 25211 I made it pretty clear what I want, to live my life free from coercion and the same for everyone else, which part don't you understand? I said something you didn't like so you attacked me personally instead of attacking my argument. Debating with you is a waste of time, thought I made that pretty clear too.