redeyezman wrote:TwoCanucks wrote:We will see what the reaction will by on the next republican administration....that said, very very positive news!
You think there are major differences between the two parties? Wow.....
I don't, myself. I generally vote a split ticket, especially at the state level.
Let's see who the GOP runs in 2016. Last time I checked Chris Christie was a Republican. Other possible candidates are Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, some others as well.
Let's examine MMJ on a state by state basis, by their governor's political party (I don't have a horse in this race, this merely piqued my curiosity):
Alaska - GOP
Arizona - GOP
Colorado - DEM (but some accuse Hickenlooper of being a DINO, due to fiscally conservative policies)
Connecticut - DEM
DC - DEM (if Marion Berry was still in charge crack would be decriminalized ;-)
Delaware - DEM
Hawaii - DEM
Illinois - DEM
Maine - GOP
Mass. - GOP
Michigan - GOP
Montana - DEM
Nevada - GOP
New Hampshire - DEM
New Jersey - GOP
New Mexico - GOP
Oregon - DEM
Rhode Island - DEM
Vermont - DEM
Washington - DEM
That's 8 Republican governors out of 20 MMJ (or legalized) states.
If Chris Christie runs, we already know where he stands.
Bobby Jindal, I'm having difficulty discovering his position (defined as 5 minutes with Google)
Marco Rubio - appears to be against.
Rick Perry - you know he's against it. Here is a really good example of what's wrong with the GOP: Bible driven politics, although Texas apparently has it going on for business.
But the first three,none of them are Bible thumpers, thankfully.
So we'll see. It's up to the Prez to set the direction for the Justice Department.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Yesterday the British House of Commons voted down their military action in Syria. What Cameron said gave me hope, hope that a US President some days has enough balls and common sense to do the same:
David Cameron quote:
David Cameron replied: "I can give that assurance. Let me say the House has not voted for either motion tonight. I strongly believe in the need for a tough response to the use of chemical weapons but I also believe in respecting the will of this House of Commons."
He added: "It is clear to me that the British Parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action. I get that and the government will act accordingly."
It's not my intention to bring Syria into this, but to demonstrate the concept of States' Rights in the U.S., and to applaud Mr. Cameron for respecting the will of the people in his country. Now, if we could get this attitude in the White House at some point.....
"Laif" with a long "a".